Humanitext Reader

Dionysius of Halicarnassus · Roman Antiquities §3.11.1-3.11.6

Tullus' Refutation and the Justification of Roman Hegemony

Passage 178 of 962 · Greek

Summary

Tullus refutes the Alban claim that mother cities must naturally rule their colonies by citing historical examples, and argues that Rome's inclusive constitution and merit-based citizenship are the true sources of its power and hegemony.

§3.11.1τοιαῦτα τοῦ Φουφεττίου λέξαντος παραλαβὼν ὁ Τύλλος τὸν λόγον εἶπε· τὸ μὲν ἐκ φύσεως καὶ προγόνων ἀρετῆς δίκαιον, ὦ Φουφέττιε καὶ ὑμεῖς ἄνδρες Ἀλβανοί, κοινὸν ἀμφοτέροις ἡμῖν· τοὺς αὐτοὺς γὰρ εὐχόμεθα προγόνους ἑκάτεροι, ὥστε οὐδὲν δεῖ τούτου χάριν οὔτε πλέον ἡμῶν ἔχειν τοὺς ἑτέρους οὔτʼ ἔλαττον.
When Fufetius had spoken thus, Tullus took up the discourse and said: "As for the justice based on nature and the virtue of ancestors, Fufetius and you men of Alba, it is common to both of us; for we each claim the same ancestors, so that on this account there is no need for either of us to have more than the other, nor less.
τὸ δὲ ἄρχειν ἐκ παντὸς τῶν ἀποικιῶν τὰς μητροπόλεις ὡς ἀναγκαῖόν τι φύσεως νόμιμον οὔτε ἀληθὲς οὔτε δίκαιον ἠξιοῦτο ὑφʼ ὑμῶν·
But that mother cities must by all means rule their colonies as some necessary law of nature is a claim of yours that is neither true nor just.
§3.11.2πολλά γέ τοι φῦλά ἐστιν ἀνθρώπων, παρʼ οἷς αἱ μητροπόλεις οὐκ ἄρχουσιν ἀλλʼ ὑποτάττονται ταῖς ἀποικίαις.
Indeed, there are many races of men among whom the mother cities do not rule but are subject to their colonies.
μέγιστον δὲ καὶ φανερώτατον τοῦ λόγου τοῦδε παράδειγμα ἡ Σπαρτιατῶν πόλις οὐ τῶν ἄλλων μόνον ἄρχειν ἀξιοῦσα Ἑλλήνων, ἀλλὰ καὶ τοῦ Δωρικοῦ γένους ὅθεν ἀπῳκίσθη.
The greatest and most manifest example of this argument is the city of the Spartans, which deems it right to rule not only the other Greeks, but also the Dorian race from which it was colonized.
καὶ τί δεῖ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων λέγειν;
And why need we speak of others?
αὐτοὶ γὰρ ὑμεῖς οἱ τὴν ἡμετέραν πόλιν ἀποικίσαντες Λαουϊνιατῶν ἐστε ἄποικοι.
For you yourselves, who colonized our city, are colonists of the Lavinians.
§3.11.3εἰ δὴ φύσεώς ἐστι νόμος ἄρχειν τῆς ἀποικίας τὴν μητρόπολιν, οὐκ ἂν φθάνοιεν ἀμφοτέροις ἡμῖν Λαουϊνιᾶται τὰ δίκαια τάττοντες;
If, indeed, it is a law of nature for the mother city to rule the colony, would not the Lavinians be beforehand in laying down the law for both of us?
πρὸς μὲν δὴ τὸ πρῶτον ὑμῶν δικαίωμα καὶ πλείστην ἔχον εὐπροσωπίαν ταῦθʼ ἱκανά·
Against your first claim of justice, then, which has the greatest plausibility, these arguments are sufficient.
ἐπειδὴ δὲ καὶ τοὺς βίους τῶν πόλεων ἀντιπαρεξετάζειν ἀλλήλοις ἐπεχείρεις, ὦ Φουφέττιε, λέγων ὅτι τὸ μὲν Ἀλβανῶν εὐγενὲς ὅμοιον ἀεὶ διαμένει, τὸ δʼ ἡμέτερον ἐξέφθαρται ταῖς ἐπιμιξίαις τοῦ ἀλλοφύλου, καὶ οὐκ ἠξίους ἄρχειν τῶν γνησίων τοὺς νόθους οὐδὲ τῶν αὐθιγενῶν τοὺς ἐπήλυδας, μάθε καὶ κατὰ τοῦτο ἁμαρτάνων μάλιστα τὸ δικαίωμα.
But since you also attempted, Fufetius, to compare the lives of our cities with one other, saying that the noble blood of the Albans remains always the same, whereas ours has been corrupted by mixtures with foreigners, and you did not think it right for the illegitimate to rule the genuine, nor the immigrants the indigenous, learn how in this claim of justice also you err most of all.
§3.11.4ἡμεῖς γὰρ τοσούτου δέομεν αἰσχύνεσθαι κοινὴν ἀναδείξαντες τὴν πόλιν τοῖς βουλομένοις, ὥστε καὶ σεμνυνόμεθα ἐπὶ τούτῳ μάλιστα τῷ ἔργῳ, οὐκ αὐτοὶ τοῦ ζήλου τοῦδε ἄρξαντες, παρὰ δὲ τῆς Ἀθηναίων πόλεως τὸ παράδειγμα λαβόντες, ἧς μέγιστον κλέος ἐν Ἕλλησίν ἐστι, καὶ διὰ τοῦτο οὐχ ἥκιστα εἰ μὴ καὶ §3.11.5μάλιστα τὸ πολίτευμα.
For we are so far from being ashamed of having thrown open our city to all who wish, that we even pride ourselves most of all on this action, not having been ourselves the originators of this zeal, but having taken the example from the city of the Athenians, whose glory is greatest among the Greeks, and because of this not least, if not even most of all, their constitution is renowned.
καὶ τὸ πρᾶγμα ἡμῖν πολλῶν γενόμενον ἀγαθῶν αἴτιον οὔτʼ ἐπίμεμψιν οὔτε μεταμέλειαν ὡς ἡμαρτηκόσι φέρει, ἄρχει τε καὶ βουλεύει καὶ τὰς ἄλλας τιμὰς καρποῦται παρʼ ἡμῖν οὐχ ὁ πολλὰ χρήματα κεκτημένος οὐδὲ ὁ πολλοὺς πατέρας ἐπιχωρίους ἐπιδεῖξαι δυνάμενος, ἀλλʼ ὅστις ἂν ᾖ τούτων τῶν τιμῶν ἄξιος.
And this practice, having become the cause of many blessings to us, brings neither blame nor regret as if we had erred; for among us, it is not the man of great wealth, nor the one who can show many native ancestors, who rules, sits in council, and enjoys the other offices of honor, but whoever is worthy of these honors.
οὐ γὰρ ἐν ἄλλῳ τινὶ τὴν ἀνθρωπίνην εὐγένειαν ὑπάρχειν νομίζομεν, ἀλλʼ ἐν ἀρετῇ.
For we do not think that human nobility resides in anything else than virtue.
ὁ δὲ ἄλλος ὄχλος σῶμα τῆς πόλεώς ἐστιν ἰσχὺν καὶ δύναμιν τοῖς βουλευθεῖσιν ὑπὸ τῶν κρατίστων παρεχόμενος.
The rest of the multitude is the body of the city, supplying strength and power to the measures resolved upon by the best men.
μεγάλη τε ἡμῶν ἡ πόλις ἐκ μικρᾶς καὶ φοβερὰ τοῖς περιοίκοις ἐξ εὐκαταφρονήτου διὰ ταύτην τὴν φιλανθρωπίαν γέγονε, τῆς τε ἡγεμονίας, ὑπὲρ ἧς τῶν ἄλλων Λατίνων οὐδεὶς ἀντιποιεῖται πρὸς ἡμᾶς, τοῦτο Ῥωμαίοις τὸ πολίτευμα ἦρξεν οὗ §3.11.6σὺ κατηγόρεις, ὦ Φουφέττιε.
It is due to this humanity that our city has become great from small beginnings and formidable to its neighbors instead of contemptible; and of the hegemony for which no other of the Latins disputes with us, this constitution of which you, Fufetius, made accusation was the source for the Romans.
ἐν ἰσχύι γὰρ ὅπλων κεῖται τὸ τῶν πόλεων κράτος, αὕτη δʼ ἐκ πολλῶν σωμάτων γίνεται· ταῖς δὲ μικραῖς καὶ ὀλιγανθρώποις καὶ διὰ τοῦτο ἀσθενέσιν οὐκ ἔστιν ἄρχειν ἑτέρων,
For the power of cities lies in the strength of arms, and this arises from a large population; but small cities, few in numbers and therefore weak, cannot rule over others.

Notes

  1. 436οὐκ ἂν φθάνοιεν... τάττοντες — The verb φθάνω with a participle, accompanied by the negative οὐκ and potential ἄν, is an idiomatic construction expressing immediate action or strong certainty ('would not be too soon in doing', i.e., 'would immediately do'). Here it functions as a rhetorical question, implying that the Lavinians would be the very first to assert authority and lay down the law for both Rome and Alba.
  2. 436τοσούτου δέομεν αἰσχύνεσθαι — The idiom τοσούτου δέω followed by an infinitive means 'to be so far from doing something'. When paired with the following ὥστε clause of result, it emphasizes a sharp contrast ('far from being ashamed... we even pride ourselves'). The first-person plural δέομεν agrees with the subject ἡμεῖς.
  3. p.v.1p.291τοῦτο Ῥωμαίοις τὸ πολίτευμα ἦρξεν οὗ σὺ κατηγόρεις — The verb ἄρχω here takes a genitive object (the relative pronoun οὗ, referring back to the genitive antecedent ἡγεμονίας) in the sense of 'to be the source/origin of' or 'to bring about'. Literally: 'this constitution, which you accused, was the source (of the hegemony) for the Romans.'

Cite this passage

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities §3.11.1-3.11.6. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0081.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:3.11.1-3.11.6

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.