Dionysius of Halicarnassus · Roman Antiquities §2.44.1-2.44.3
Deliberations of the Sabines and Romans on War and Peace
Summary
The Sabines deliberate on whether to withdraw their forces or wait for reinforcements, finding both options and the prospect of initiating peace negotiations highly problematic. Meanwhile, the Romans are in equal perplexity, realizing that both returning and keeping the women carry grave disadvantages, and fearing that the haughty Sabines would offer no moderate terms for peace.
Notes
- 2.44.1πότερον ἀποίσουσιν ... ἢ προσμεταπέμπωνται — A mixture of moods in the indirect double question introduced by πότερον ... ἢ ('whether... or...'). The first verb ἀποίσουσιν is in the future indicative, whereas the subsequent verbs προσμεταπέμπωνται and προσμένωσι are in the deliberative subjunctive. Such alternation between indicative and subjunctive moods is a well-known feature in classical and Hellenistic Greek indirect questions.
- 2.44.3ἀναγκαῖόν σφισιν ἐσόμενον — An accusative absolute construction using the impersonal future participle ἐσόμενον. In the indirect discourse introduced by οἰόμενοι ('thinking'), the impersonal construction ἀναγκαῖον ἔσται ('it will be necessary') is put into the accusative absolute form (ἀναγκαῖον ἐσόμενον).
- 2.44.3ταῖς αὐθαδείαις — The dative plural of the abstract noun αὐθάδεια ('arrogance, stubbornness'). Plural forms of abstract nouns often denote instances of that quality or 'arrogant dispositions/minds.' Here, it functions as a dative of possession or reference with γίνεται ('in/for arrogant minds, there does not arise...').
Cite this passage
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities §2.44.1-2.44.3. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0081.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:2.44.1-2.44.3
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.