Humanitext Reader

Diodorus Siculus · Bibliotheca Historica §1.89.1-1.89.6

Deification of Crocodiles and the Political Origin of Animal Worship

Passage 90 of 406 · Greek

Summary

The text explains the reasons for the deification of crocodiles in Egypt, noting their utility for defense and the legend of King Menas' rescue, and presents a theory that local animal worship and food taboos were political designs by an ancient wise king to prevent the unification of the populace.

§1.89.1λείπεται δʼ ἡμῖν εἰπεῖν περὶ τῆς τῶν κροκοδείλων ἀποθεώσεως, ὑπὲρ ἧς οἱ πλεῖστοι διαποροῦσι πῶς τῶν θηρίων τούτων σαρκοφαγούντων τοὺς ἀνθρώπους ἐνομοθετήθη τιμᾶν ἴσα θεοῖς τοὺς τὰ δεινότατα διατιθέντας. §1.89.2φασὶν οὖν τῆς χώρας τὴν ὀχυρότητα παρέχεσθαι μὴ μόνον τὸν ποταμόν, ἀλλὰ καὶ πολὺ μᾶλλον τοὺς ἐν αὐτῷ κροκοδείλους· διὸ καὶ τοὺς λῃστὰς τούς τε ἀπὸ τῆς Ἀραβίας καὶ Λιβύης μὴ τολμᾶν διανήχεσθαι τὸν Νεῖλον, φοβουμένους τὸ πλῆθος τῶν θηρίων· τοῦτο δʼ οὐκ ἄν ποτε γενέσθαι πολεμουμένων τῶν ζῴων καὶ διὰ τῶν σαγηνευόντων ἄρδην ἀναιρεθέντων.
And it remains for us to speak about the deification of crocodiles, concerning which most people are utterly at a loss as to how, since these beasts eat human flesh, it was established by law to honor on an equal footing with the gods those who inflict the most terrible injuries. They say, then, that the security of the country is provided not only by the river, but much more by the crocodiles in it; wherefore also the robbers from both Arabia and Libya do not dare to swim across the Nile, fearing the multitude of these beasts; and this would never have been the case if the animals were hunted and utterly destroyed by those who use drag-nets. There is also another story told about these beasts.
§1.89.3ἔστι δὲ καὶ ἄλλος λόγος ἱστορούμενος περὶ τῶν θηρίων τούτων. φασὶ γάρ τινες τῶν ἀρχαίων τινὰ βασιλέων, τὸν προσαγορευόμενον Μηνᾶν, διωκόμενον ὑπὸ τῶν ἰδίων κυνῶν καταφυγεῖν εἰς τὴν Μοίριδος καλουμένην λίμνην, ἔπειθʼ ὑπὸ κροκοδείλου παραδόξως ἀναληφθέντα εἰς τὸ πέραν ἀπενεχθῆναι.
For some say that one of the ancient kings, the one called Menas, being pursued by his own dogs, fled into the lake called Moeris, and then, being unexpectedly taken up by a crocodile, was carried across to the opposite bank.
τῆς δὲ σωτηρίας χάριν ἀποδιδόναι βουλόμενον τῷ ζῴῳ πόλιν κτίσαι πλησίον ὀνομάσαντα Κροκοδείλων· καταδεῖξαι δὲ καὶ τοῖς ἐγχωρίοις ὡς θεοὺς τιμᾶν ταῦτα τὰ ζῷα καὶ τὴν λίμνην αὐτοῖς εἰς τροφὴν ἀναθεῖναι· ἐνταῦθα δὲ καὶ τὸν τάφον ἑαυτῷ κατασκευάσαι πυραμίδα τετράπλευρον ἐπιστήσαντα, καὶ τὸν θαυμαζόμενον παρὰ πολλοῖς λαβύρινθον οἰκοδομῆσαι. §1.89.4παραπλήσια δὲ καὶ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων λέγουσιν, ὑπὲρ ὧν τὰ καθʼ ἕκαστον μακρὸν ἂν εἴη γράφειν.
Wishing to render thanks to the animal for his safety, he founded a city nearby, naming it Crocodiles; and he ordained to the inhabitants to honor these animals as gods and dedicated the lake to them for their food; and there he also constructed a tomb for himself, placing upon it a four-sided pyramid, and built the labyrinth which is admired by many. They say similar things about the other animals too, concerning which it would be tedious to write in detail.
ὅτι γὰρ τῆς ὠφελείας ἕνεκα τῆς εἰς τὸν βίον οὕτως ἑαυτοὺς εἰθίκασι, φανερὸν εἶναι πᾶσιν ἐκ τοῦ πολλὰ τῶν ἐδωδίμων παρʼ αὐτοῖς ἐνίους μὴ προσφέρεσθαι.
For that they have accustomed themselves in this way for the sake of its utility for life, is clear to all from the fact that some among them do not partake of many of the edible things.
τινὰς μὲν γὰρ φακῶν, τινὰς δὲ κυάμων, ἐνίους δὲ τυρῶν ἢ κρομμύων ἤ τινων ἄλλων βρωμάτων τὸ παράπαν μὴ γεύεσθαι, πολλῶν ὑπαρχόντων κατὰ τὴν Αἴγυπτον, δῆλον ποιοῦντας διότι διδακτέον ἐστὶν ἑαυτοὺς τῶν χρησίμων ἀπέχεσθαι, καὶ διότι πάντων πάντα ἐσθιόντων οὐδὲν ἂν ἐξήρκεσε τῶν ἀναλισκομένων. §1.89.5καὶ ἑτέρας δʼ αἰτίας φέροντές τινές φασιν ἐπὶ τῶν παλαιῶν βασιλέων πολλάκις ἀφισταμένου τοῦ πλήθους καὶ συμφρονοῦντος κατὰ τῶν ἡγουμένων, τῶν βασιλέων τινὰ συνέσει διαφέροντα διελέσθαι μὲν τὴν χώραν εἰς πλείω μέρη, καθʼ ἕκαστον δʼ αὐτῶν καταδεῖξαι τοῖς ἐγχωρίοις σέβεσθαί τι ζῷον ἢ τροφῆς τινος μὴ γεύεσθαι, ὅπως ἑκάστων τὸ μὲν παρʼ αὐτοῖς τιμώμενον σεβομένων, τῶν δὲ παρὰ τοῖς ἄλλοις ἀφιερωμένων καταφρονούντων, μηδέποτε ὁμονοῆσαι δύνωνται πάντες οἱ κατʼ Αἴγυπτον. §1.89.6καὶ τοῦτο ἐκ τῶν ἀποτελεσμάτων φανερὸν εἶναι· πάντας γὰρ τοὺς πλησιοχώρους πρὸς ἀλλήλους διαφέρεσθαι, προσκόπτοντας ταῖς εἰς τὰ προειρημένα παρανομίαις.
For some do not taste lentils at all, others broad beans, others cheese or onions or certain other foods, although there are many such available in Egypt, thereby making it clear that they must teach themselves to abstain from useful things, and that if everyone ate everything, nothing of the resources consumed would have sufficed. And bringing forward other reasons, some say that in the time of the ancient kings, since the multitude often revolted and conspired against their rulers, one of the kings who excelled in intelligence divided the country into several parts, and appointed for each of them that the inhabitants should worship some animal or abstain from some food, in order that, while each group revered what was honored among themselves but looked down upon what was consecrated among the others, all the people throughout Egypt might never be able to live in harmony. And that this is clear from the results; for all the neighboring peoples are at variance with one another, taking offense at the violations of the aforementioned taboos.

Notes

  1. 1.89.1τοὺς τὰ δεινότατα διατιθέντας — Meaning "those who inflict the most terrible things (upon others)". The verb διατίθημι means "to dispose" or "to treat", and here with the accusative object "the most terrible things (τὰ δεινότατα)" it refers in this context to inflicting the most dreadful injuries upon humans. It is a substantivized active participle.
  2. 1.89.2τοῦτο δʼ οὐκ ἄν ποτε γενέσθαι πολεμουμένων τῶν ζῴων καὶ διὰ τῶν σαγηγευόντων ἄρδην ἀναιρεθέντων — The structure of ἄν with the infinitive (οὐκ ἄν ποτε γενέσθαι) represents the apodosis of a contrary-to-fact condition in indirect discourse. In direct discourse, this would be οὐκ ἄν ποτε ἐγένε토 ("it would never have happened"). The condition (protasis) is expressed by the genitive absolute participles (πολεμουμένων ... ἀναιρεθέντων: "if the animals were hunted and utterly destroyed").
  3. 1.89.4ὅτι γὰρ τῆς ὠφελείας ἕνεκα ... φανερὸν εἶναι — An irregular construction of the ὅτι clause in indirect discourse. Normally, a finite verb in the indicative or optative mood follows ὅτι, but under the strong influence of the governing verb of speaking (such as φασίν, continuing from previous sections), the verb within the ὅτι clause has been attracted into the infinitive (εἶναι).

Cite this passage

Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca Historica §1.89.1-1.89.6. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0060.tlg001.humanitext-grc5:1.89.1-1.89.6

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.