Humanitext Reader

Plato · Timaeus §30-31

Creation of the Cosmos as a Living Being and Its Body

Passage 8 of 41 · Greek

Summary

Timaeus explains that the Demiurge brought order out of chaos, creating the cosmos as a living, intelligent being with soul and body, and argues for its uniqueness and the mathematical proportion used to bind its physical form consisting of fire and earth.

§30ΤΙ. ταύτην δὴ γενέσεως καὶ κόσμου μάλιστʼ ἄν τις ἀρχὴν κυριωτάτην παρʼ ἀνδρῶν φρονίμων ἀποδεχόμενος ὀρθότατα ἀποδέχοιτʼ ἄν.
Timaeus: Accepting this indeed from wise men as the most principal beginning of becoming and the cosmos, one would accept it most correctly.
βουληθεὶς γὰρ ὁ θεὸς ἀγαθὰ μὲν πάντα, φλαῦρον δὲ μηδὲν εἶναι κατὰ δύναμιν, οὕτω δὴ πᾶν ὅσον ἦν ὁρατὸν παραλαβὼν οὐχ ἡσυχίαν ἄγον ἀλλὰ κινούμενον πλημμελῶς καὶ ἀτάκτως, εἰς τάξιν αὐτὸ ἤγαγεν ἐκ τῆς ἀταξίας, ἡγησάμενος ἐκεῖνο τούτου πάντως ἄμεινον.
For god, wishing that all things should be good, and nothing, so far as possible, should be bad, thus took over all that was visible—which was not at rest but moving discordantly and disorderly—and brought it into order out of disorder, thinking that the former was in every way better than the latter.
θέμις δʼ οὔτʼ ἦν οὔτʼ ἔστιν τῷ ἀρίστῳ δρᾶν ἄλλο πλὴν τὸ κάλλιστον· λογισάμενος οὖν ηὕρισκεν ἐκ τῶν κατὰ φύσιν ὁρατῶν οὐδὲν ἀνόητον τοῦ νοῦν ἔχοντος ὅλον ὅλου κάλλιον ἔσεσθαί ποτε ἔργον, νοῦν δʼ αὖ χωρὶς ψυχῆς ἀδύνατον παραγενέσθαι τῳ.
And it neither was nor is lawful for the best to do anything other than the most beautiful; considering therefore, he found that among things visible by nature, no work destitute of intellect as a whole would ever be more beautiful than one possessing intellect as a whole, and moreover, that it is impossible for intellect to belong to anything apart from a soul.
διὰ δὴ τὸν λογισμὸν τόνδε νοῦν μὲν ἐν ψυχῇ, ψυχὴν δʼ ἐν σώματι συνιστὰς τὸ πᾶν συνετεκταίνετο, ὅπως ὅτι κάλλιστον εἴη κατὰ φύσιν ἄριστόν τε ἔργον ἀπειργασμένος.
For this reason, then, having constructed intellect within soul, and soul within body, he fashioned the universe, in order that he might complete a work that is by nature most beautiful and best.
οὕτως οὖν δὴ κατὰ λόγον τὸν εἰκότα δεῖ λέγειν τόνδε τὸν κόσμον ζῷον ἔμψυχον ἔννουν τε τῇ ἀληθείᾳ διὰ τὴν τοῦ θεοῦ γενέσθαι πρόνοιαν.
Thus, then, according to the likely speech, one must say that this cosmos has truly become a living being endowed with soul and intellect through the providence of god.
τούτου δʼ ὑπάρχοντος αὖ τὰ τούτοις ἐφεξῆς ἡμῖν λεκτέον, τίνι τῶν ζῴων αὐτὸν εἰς ὁμοιότητα ὁ συνιστὰς συνέστησεν.
This being established, we must say next what follows upon this: to which of the living beings did the constructor construct it in likeness?
τῶν μὲν οὖν ἐν μέρους εἴδει πεφυκότων μηδενὶ καταξιώσωμεν —ἀτελεῖ γὰρ ἐοικὸς οὐδέν ποτʼ ἂν γένοιτο καλόν—οὗ δʼ ἔστιν τἆλλα ζῷα καθʼ ἓν καὶ κατὰ γένη μόρια, τούτῳ πάντων ὁμοιότατον αὐτὸν εἶναι τιθῶμεν.
Let us not deign to liken it to any of those things that exist in the form of a part—for nothing resembled to what is incomplete could ever be beautiful—but let us posit that it is of all things most like to that of which all other living beings, both individually and by genera, are parts.
τὰ γὰρ δὴ νοητὰ ζῷα πάντα ἐκεῖνο ἐν ἑαυτῷ περιλαβὸν ἔχει, καθάπερ ὅδε ὁ κόσμος ἡμᾶς ὅσα τε ἄλλα θρέμματα συνέστηκεν ὁρατά.
For that indeed contains and encompasses within itself all intelligible living beings, just as this cosmos contains us and all other visible creatures that have been constructed.
§31ΤΙ. τῷ γὰρ τῶν νοουμένων καλλίστῳ καὶ κατὰ πάντα τελέῳ μάλιστα αὐτὸν ὁ θεὸς ὁμοιῶσαι βουληθεὶς ζῷον ἓν ὁρατόν, πάνθʼ ὅσα αὐτοῦ κατὰ φύσιν συγγενῆ ζῷα ἐντὸς ἔχον ἑαυτοῦ, συνέστησε.
Timaeus: For, god wishing to liken it most of all to the most beautiful of intelligible things and complete in every way, constructed it as a single visible living being, containing within itself all the living beings that are by nature akin to it.
πότερον οὖν ὀρθῶς ἕνα οὐρανὸν προσειρήκαμεν, ἢ πολλοὺς καὶ ἀπείρους λέγειν ἦν ὀρθότερον;
Have we then correctly called heaven "one," or was it more correct to speak of many and infinite?
ἕνα, εἴπερ κατὰ τὸ παράδειγμα δεδημιουργημένος ἔσται.
One, if indeed it is to be crafted according to the model.
τὸ γὰρ περιέχον πάντα ὁπόσα νοητὰ ζῷα μεθʼ ἑτέρου δεύτερον οὐκ ἄν ποτʼ εἴη· πάλιν γὰρ ἂν ἕτερον εἶναι τὸ περὶ ἐκείνω δέοι ζῷον, οὗ μέρος ἂν εἴτην ἐκείνω, καὶ οὐκ ἂν ἔτι ἐκείνοιν ἀλλʼ ἐκείνῳ τῷ περιέχοντι τόδʼ ἂν ἀφωμοιωμένον λέγοιτο ὀρθότερον.
For that which encompasses all intelligible living beings could never be a second along with another; for again there would have to be another living being encompassing those two, of which those two would be parts, and then this cosmos would no longer be said to be likened to those two, but more correctly to that which encompasses them.
ἵνα οὖν τόδε κατὰ τὴν μόνωσιν ὅμοιον ᾖ τῷ παντελεῖ ζῴῳ, διὰ ταῦτα οὔτε δύο οὔτʼ ἀπείρους ἐποίησεν ὁ ποιῶν κόσμους, ἀλλʼ εἷς ὅδε μονογενὴς οὐρανὸς γεγονὼς ἔστιν καὶ ἔτʼ ἔσται.
In order, then, that this cosmos might be like the all-complete living being in respect of its uniqueness, for this reason the maker made neither two nor infinite worlds, but this one and only generated heaven is and will continue to be.
σωματοειδὲς δὲ δὴ καὶ ὁρατὸν ἁπτόν τε δεῖ τὸ γενόμενον εἶναι, χωρισθὲν δὲ πυρὸς οὐδὲν ἄν ποτε ὁρατὸν γένοιτο, οὐδὲ ἁπτὸν ἄνευ τινὸς στερεοῦ, στερεὸν δὲ οὐκ ἄνευ γῆς·
Now, what has become must be bodily, visible, and tangible; but nothing could ever become visible apart from fire, nor tangible without some solid, nor solid without earth.
ὅθεν ἐκ πυρὸς καὶ γῆς τὸ τοῦ παντὸς ἀρχόμενος συνιστάναι σῶμα ὁ θεὸς ἐποίει.
Hence, starting to construct the body of the universe out of fire and earth, god made it.
δύο δὲ μόνω καλῶς συνίστασθαι τρίτου χωρὶς οὐ δυνατόν· δεσμὸν γὰρ ἐν μέσῳ δεῖ τινα ἀμφοῖν συναγωγὸν γίγνεσθαι.
But it is not possible for two things alone to be beautifully put together without a third, for there must be some bond in the middle to bring them both together.
δεσμῶν δὲ κάλλιστος ὃς ἂν αὑτὸν καὶ τὰ συνδούμενα ὅτι μάλιστα ἓν ποιῇ, τοῦτο δὲ πέφυκεν ἀναλογία κάλλιστα ἀποτελεῖν.
And the most beautiful of bonds is that which makes itself and the things bound together as much one as possible, and proportion by nature accomplishes this in the most beautiful way.

Notes

  1. 30bοὐδὲν ἀνόητον τοῦ νοῦν ἔχοντος ὅλον ὅλου κάλλιον ἔσεσθαί ποτε ἔργον — A comparative construction with the genitive of comparison (τοῦ νοῦν ἔχοντος... ὅλου). The contrast is between ὅλον (as a whole, in the nominative, modifying the subject) and ὅλου (than a whole, in the genitive). The sentence means 'no work destitute of intellect as a whole (οὐδὲν ἀνόητον... ὅλον) will ever be more beautiful than one possessing intellect as a whole (τοῦ νοῦν ἔχοντος... ὅλου)'.
  2. 31aτὸ γὰρ περιέχον πάντα ὁπόσα νοητὰ ζῷα μεθʼ ἑτέρου δεύτερον οὐκ ἄν ποτʼ εἴη — The clause with the relative pronoun ὁπόσα (as many as) modifies πάντα, making the subject 'that which encompasses (τὸ περιέχον) all as many as are intelligible living beings'. This serves as a syntactic transition to the argument necessitating a third entity to encompass the hypothetical two models.

Cite this passage

Plato, Timaeus §30-31. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg031.humanitext-grc2:30-31

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.