Humanitext Reader

Plutarch · Life of Aristides §2.1-2.5

The Origins of Rivalry with Themistocles

Passage 2 of 27 · Greek

Summary

This chunk describes the contrasting characters and early rivalry of Aristides and Themistocles, their personal enmity arising from a romantic competition over Stesilaus that carried over into their political careers, and their different approaches to political alliances.

§2.1Ἀριστείδης δὲ Κλεισθένους μὲν τοῦ καταστησαμένου τὴν πολιτείαν μετὰ τοὺς τυράννους ἑταῖρος γενόμενος, ζηλώσας δὲ καὶ θαυμάσας μάλιστα τῶν πολιτικῶν ἀνδρῶν Λυκοῦργον τὸν Λακεδαιμόνιον, ἥψατο μὲν ἀριστοκρατικῆς πολιτείας, ἔσχε δʼ ἀντιτασσόμενον ὑπὲρ τοῦ δήμου Θεμιστοκλέα τὸν Νεοκλέους.
Aristides became an associate of Cleisthenes, who established the constitution after the tyrants, but because he especially admired and emulated Lycurgus the Lacedaemonian among political men, he attached himself to an aristocratic form of government, and had as his opponent Themistocles, the son of Neocles, who championed the people.
ἔνιοι μὲν οὖν φασιν παῖδας ὄντας αὐτοὺς καὶ συντρεφομένους ἀπʼ ἀρχῆς ἐν παντὶ καὶ σπουδῆς ἐχομένῳ καὶ παιδιᾶς πράγματι καὶ λόγῳ διαφέρεσθαι πρὸς ἀλλήλους, §2.2καὶ τὰς φύσεις εὐθὺς ὑπὸ τῆς φιλονεικίας ἐκείνης ἀνακαλύπτεσθαι, τὴν μὲν εὐχερῆ καὶ παράβολον καὶ πανοῦργον οὖσαν καὶ μετʼ ὀξύτητος ἐπὶ πάντα ῥᾳδίως φερομένην, τὴν δʼ ἱδρυμένην ἐν ἤθει βεβαίῳ καὶ πρὸς τὸ δίκαιον ἀτενῆ, ψεῦδος δὲ καὶ βωμολοχίαν καὶ ἀπάτην οὐδʼ ἐν παιδιᾶς τινι τρόπῳ προσιεμένην.
Some, therefore, say that even when they were boys and were brought up together, they differed from each other from the very beginning in every word and deed, whether serious or playful; and that their natural dispositions were immediately revealed by that rivalry—the one being compliant, reckless, and unscrupulous, and easily carried away with quickness toward everything, the other established on a firm character and intent upon justice, admitting no falsehood, vulgarity, or deceit, not even in any playful manner.
ἀρίστων δʼ ὁ Κεῖος ἐξ ἐρωτικῆς ἀρχῆς γενέσθαι φησὶ καὶ προελθεῖν ἐπὶ τοσοῦτον τὴν ἔχθραν αὐτῶν.
But Ariston of Ceos says that their enmity arose from a romantic beginning and advanced to such a degree.
§2.3Στησίλεω γάρ, ὃς ἦν γένει Κεῖος, ἰδέᾳ τε καὶ μορφῇ σώματος πολὺ τῶν ἐν ὥρᾳ λαμπρότατος, ἀμφοτέρους ἐρασθέντας οὐ μετρίως ἐνεγκεῖν τὸ πάθος οὐδʼ ἅμα λήγοντι τῷ κάλλει τοῦ παιδὸς ἀποθέσθαι τὴν φιλονεικίαν, ἀλλʼ ὥσπερ ἐγγυμνασαμένους ἐκείνῃ πρὸς τὴν πολιτείαν εὐθὺς ὁρμῆσαι διαπύρους ὄντας καὶ διαφόρως ἔχοντας.
For both, having fallen deeply in love with Stesilaus, who was a Cean by birth and by far the most brilliant in appearance and physical beauty among those in the bloom of youth, could not bear their passion with moderation; nor did they put away their rivalry when the beauty of the boy faded, but as if they had trained themselves in that affair, they immediately rushed into politics, being burning with passion and at variance with one another.
§2.4ὁ μὲν οὖν Θεμιστοκλῆς εἰς ἑταιρείαν ἐμβαλὼν ἑαυτὸν εἶχε πρόβλημα καὶ δύναμιν οὐκ εὐκαταφρόνητον, ὥστε καὶ πρὸς τὸν εἰπόντα καλῶς αὐτὸν ἄρξειν Ἀθηναίων, ἄνπερ ἴσος ᾖ καὶ κοινὸς ἅπασι μηδέποτε, εἰπεῖν, εἰς τοῦτον ἐγὼ καθίσαιμι τὸν θρόνον, ἐν ᾧ πλέον οὐδὲν ἕξουσιν οἱ φίλοι παρʼ ἐμοὶ τῶν ἀλλοτρίων· §2.5Ἀριστείδης δὲ καθʼ ἑαυτὸν ὥσπερ ὁδὸν ἰδίαν ἐβάδιζε διὰ τῆς πολιτείας, πρῶτον μὲν οὐ βουλόμενος συναδικεῖν τοῖς ἑταίροις ἢ λυπηρὸς εἶναι μὴ χαριζόμενος, ἔπειτα τὴν ἀπὸ τῶν φίλων δύναμιν οὐκ ὀλίγους ἰδὼν ἐπαίρουσαν ἀδικεῖν ἐφυλάττετο, μόνῳ τῷ χρηστὰ καὶ δίκαια πράττειν καὶ λέγειν ἀξιῶν θαρρεῖν τὸν ἀγαθὸν πολίτην.
Now Themistocles, throwing himself into a political association, possessed a defense and a power that was not to be despised, so that when someone said to him that he would govern the Athenians well if only he would be equal and impartial to all, he even said: "May I never sit upon that throne where my friends would gain nothing more from me than strangers!" But Aristides walked, as it were, a path of his own through politics; first, because he did not wish to join his associates in wrongdoing, nor to be troublesome to them by not granting favors; and secondly, because he saw that the power derived from friends encouraged not a few to commit injustice, he was on his guard, deeming that a good citizen should rely solely on doing and saying what is good and just.

Notes

  1. §2.1ἔσχε δʼ ἀντιτασσόμενον — A construction where the middle-passive present participle `ἀντιτασσόμενον` is used predicatively with `ἔσχε`, meaning 'he had Themistocles standing in opposition' (i.e., as an opponent). The prepositional phrase `ὑπὲρ τοῦ δήμου` (on behalf of the people) modifies the participle `ἀντιτασσόμενον`, defining Themistocles' political stance.
  2. §2.2τὴν μὲν εὐχερῆ ... τὴν δʼ ἱδρυμένην — A partitive apposition specifying the accusative plural `τὰς φύσεις` (their characters). The feminine accusative singular articles `τὴν μὲν` and `τὴν δʼ` imply the omitted noun `φύσιν`, with the former describing Themistocles' innate character and the latter describing Aristides'.
  3. §2.4καθίσαιμι — An independent optative of wish expressing a strong desire or prayer. Accompanied by the negative particle `μηδέποτε`, it represents Themistocles' vehement rejection and declaration of intent never to occupy a seat of power that lacks impartiality.
  4. §2.5πρῶτον μὲν οὐ βουλόμενος ... ἔπειτα ... ἐφυλάττετο — An instance of grammatical asymmetry (anacoluthon). Although `πρῶτον μὲν` and `ἔπειτα` are in contrast, the former is introduced by the participle phrase `οὐ βουλόμενος` (not wishing), while the latter shifts to the finite main verb `ἐφυλάττετο` (he was on his guard), juxtaposing Aristides' personal principles with his practical caution.

Cite this passage

Plutarch, Life of Aristides §2.1-2.5. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg024.humanitext-grc2:2.1-2.5

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.