[ULPIANUS libro trigensimo septimo ad edictum. ] §9.4.42.prSi ad libertatem proclamauerit is cuius nomine noxale iudicium susceptum est, sustineri debet id iudicium, quoad de statu eius iudicetur: et sic, si quidem seruus fuerit pronuntiatus, noxale iudicium exercebitur, si liber, inutile uidebitur.
[ULPIAN, Book XXXVII on the Edict.] If the person on whose behalf a noxal action has been undertaken should claim his freedom, that action must be stayed until judgment is rendered regarding his status; and thus, if indeed he is pronounced to be a slave, the noxal action will be prosecuted, but if he is declared free, it will be considered of no effect.
§9.4.42.1Si quis pro seruo mortuo ignorans eum decessisse noxale iudicium acceperit, absolui debet, quia desit uerum esse propter eum dare oportere.
If anyone, being ignorant that a slave has died, accepts a noxal action on behalf of a deceased slave, he ought to be acquitted, because it ceases to be true that there is an obligation to surrender (or pay) on account of him.
§9.4.42.2Hae actiones perpetuae sunt locumque habebunt tamdiu, quamdiu serui dedendi facultatem habemus: nec tantum nobis, uerum etiam successoribus nostris competent, item aduersus successores, sed non quasi in successores, sed iure dominii.
These actions are perpetual and will be available so long as we have the power of surrendering the slave; and they will belong not only to us, but also to our successors, and likewise against successors, yet not as it were against them as successors, but by right of ownership.
proinde et si seruus ad alium peruenisse proponatur, iure dominii noxali iudicio nouus dominus conuenietur.
Accordingly, even if it is asserted that the slave has passed to another person, the new owner will be sued in a noxal action by right of ownership.