[IDEM libro secundo ad Urseium Ferocem. ] §9.4.41.prCum seruus communis alteri dominorum damnum iniuria dedit, idcirco legis Aquiliae actio non est, quia, si extraneo damnum dedisset, cum altero in solidum lege Aquilia agi posset: sicuti, cum seruus communis furtum fecerit, cum altero domino furti agi non potest, sed communi diuidundo agi potest.
[THE SAME, Book II on Urseius Ferox.] When a common slave has unlawfully caused damage to one of his masters, an action under the Lex Aquilia does not lie for that reason, because, if he had caused damage to a stranger, an action under the Lex Aquilia could have been brought against the other master for the whole amount; just as, when a common slave has committed a theft, an action for theft cannot be brought against the other master, but an action for division of common property can be brought.