[ULPIANUS libro sexto decimo ad edictum. ] §6.2.1.prAit praetor: 'Si quis id quod traditur ex iusta causa non a domino et nondum usucaptum petet, iudicium dabo. ' §6.2.1.1Merito praetor ait 'nondum usucaptum': nam si usucaptum est, habet ciuilem actionem nec desiderat honorariam.
[ULPIANUS libro sexto decimo ad edictum.] The praetor says: 'If anyone sues for that which has been delivered on a lawful ground, but not by the owner, and has not yet been acquired by usucapion, I will grant an action.' With good reason the praetor says 'not yet acquired by usucapion': for if it has been acquired by usucapion, he has a civil action and does not need an honorary one.
§6.2.1.2Sed cur traditionis dumtaxat et usucapionis fecit mentionem, cum satis multae sunt iuris partes, quibus dominium quis nancisceretur? ut puta legatum
But why did he make mention only of delivery and usucapion, when there are quite many areas of law by which one might acquire ownership? For instance, a legacy.