[FURIUS ANTHIANUS libro primo ad edictum. ] §6.1.80.prIn rem actionem pati non compellimur, quia licet alicui dicere se non possidere, ita ut, si possit aduersarius conuincere rem ab aduersario possideri, transferat ad se possessionem per iudicem, licet suam esse non adprobauerit.
[FURIUS ANTHIANUS, in the first book of his Commentary on the Edict.] are not compelled to defend an action in rem, because anyone is allowed to say that he does not possess; with the result that, if the adversary can prove that the thing is possessed by his opponent, he may transfer the possession to himself through the judge, even though he has not proved that it is his own.