[IDEM libro septuagensimo tertio digestorum. ] §44.7.19.prEx promissione dotis: non uidetur lucratiua causa esse, sed quodammodo creditor aut emptor intellegitur, qui dotem petit.
[THE SAME, from the seventy-third book of Digests.] In the case of a promise of a dowry, it is not deemed to be a lucrative cause, but rather, he who claims the dowry is understood to be in some sense a creditor or a buyer.
porro cum creditor uel emptor ex lucratiua causa rem habere coeperit, nihilo minus integras actiones retinent, sicut ex contrario qui non ex causa lucratiua rem habere coepit, eandem non prohibetur ex lucratiua causa petere.
Furthermore, when a creditor or a buyer has come to possess the thing through a lucrative cause, they nevertheless retain their actions unimpaired, just as, conversely, he who has come to possess a thing not through a lucrative cause is not prohibited from claiming the same thing through a lucrative cause.