[IDEM libro septimo decimo quaestionum. ]
[THE SAME, Questions, Book 17] When an heir is requested to restore an inheritance through a trust after deducting legacies, it is not approved that those legacies which could not be claimed should be deducted.
§36.1.53.prCum heres deductis legatis hereditatem per fideicommissum restituere rogatur, non placet ea legata deduci, quae peti non poterant. sed cum uxori pro parte heredi scriptae dos praelegetur eaque deductis legatis hereditatem restituere rogatur: etiamsi quarta, quam per legem Falcidiam retinet, tantum efficiat, quantum in dote est, tamen pro sua portione dotis praelegatae partem deducit.
But when a dowry is pre-legacyed to a wife who is appointed heir for a part, and she is requested to restore the inheritance after deducting legacies: even if the fourth which she retains under the Falcidian law amounts to as much as is in the dowry, nevertheless she deducts a part of the pre-legacyed dowry in proportion to her share.
cum enim utrumque consequitur, nihil interest inter hanc mulierem et quemuis alium creditorem heredem institutum et hereditatem restituere rogatum.
For since she obtains both, there is no difference between this woman and any other creditor who has been appointed heir and requested to restore the inheritance.
idem probatur et si non deductis legatis fideicommissum ab ea relictum sit.
The same is approved even if the trust has been left to be restored by her without the deduction of legacies.