[PAPINIANUS libro septimo responsorum. ] §34.1.8.prPecuniae sortem alimentis libertorum destinatam unum ex heredibus secundum uoluntatem defuncti praecipientem cauere non esse cogendum ex persona deficientium partes coheredibus restitui placuit: ob eam igitur speciem post mortem omnium libertorum indebiti non competit actio nec utilis dabitur.
[PAPINIANUS, in his seventh book of Opinions.] It was held that one of the co-heirs who, in accordance with the will of the deceased, takes beforehand a principal sum of money destined for the maintenance of freedmen, should not be compelled to give security that, upon the death of individual recipients, their portions will be restored to the other co-heirs. Therefore, under this specific circumstance, after the death of all the freedmen, an action for the return of what was not due does not lie, nor will an equitable action be granted.
diuersa causa est eius, cui legatorum diuisio mandatur: nam ea res praesentem ac momentariam curam iniungit, alimentorum uero praebendorum necessitas oneribus menstruis atque annuis uerecundiam quoque pulsantibus adstringitur.
The case of one to whom the distribution of legacies is entrusted is different; for that task imposes an immediate and temporary care, whereas the necessity of providing maintenance is bound up with monthly and annual burdens which also appeal to a sense of moral duty.