[IDEM libro uicesimo tertio quaestionum. ] §31.0.73.prSi quod ex Pamphila nascetur legatum mihi fuerit et ego Pamphilam emam eaque apud me sit enixa, ratione summa responsum est non ex causa lucratiua partum intellegi meum factum ideoque petendum ex testamento, tamquam istum emissem, ut scilicet pretii contributione facta consequar tantum, quanti puerum deducta matris aestimatione constitisse mihi iudex in causa legati datus aestimauerit.
[BY THE SAME AUTHOR, in the twenty-third book of Questions.] If a child to be born of Pamphila has been bequeathed to me, and I purchase Pamphila, and she gives birth while in my possession, it has been answered on the highest legal principle that the offspring is not understood to have become mine by a lucrative title, and therefore a claim must be made under the will, as if I had purchased the child itself; namely, so that, a division of the price having been made, I may recover as much as the judge appointed for the case of the legacy estimates the boy to have cost me, after deducting the valuation of the mother.