[IDEM libro quinto ad Minicium. ] §3.3.76.prTitius cum absentem defenderet, satisdedit et prius quam iudicium acciperet desiit reus soluendo esse: quam ob causam defensor recusabat iudicium in se reddi oportere.
[THE SAME in the fifth book on Minicius.] When Titius was defending an absent person, he gave security, and before he accepted the joinder of issue, he ceased to be a solvent defendant. For this reason, the defender refused to allow that the action ought to be granted against him.
quaero, an id ei concedi oporteat.
I ask whether this ought to be granted to him.
Iulianus respondit: defensor cum satisdedit, domini loco habendus est.
Julianus answered: when a defender has given security, he must be regarded as being in the position of the principal.
nec multum ei praestaturus est praetor, si eum non coegerit iudicium accipere, cum ad fideiussores eius iri possit et hi quidquid praestiterint a defensore consecuturi sint.
Nor will the praetor afford him much advantage if he does not compel him to accept the joinder of issue, since his guarantors can be proceeded against, and they will recover whatever they pay from the defender.