[IULIANUS libro tertio digestorum. ] §3.3.75.prQui absentem emptorem eundemque possessorem fundi defendebat et iudicium nomine eius accipiebat, postulabat a uenditore fundi, ut ab eo defenderetur: uenditor desiderabat caueri sibi ratam rem emptorem habiturum: puto eum uenditori de rato satisdare debere, quia si fundum agenti restituerit, nihil prohibet dominum rem petere et cogi uenditorem rursus defendere.
[JULIANUS in the third book of the Digests.] He who defended an absent buyer who was also the possessor of a tract of land, and accepted the joinder of issue in his name, demanded of the seller of the land that he be defended by him; the seller desired security to be given to him that the buyer would ratify the matter; I think that he ought to give security to the seller for ratification, because if he should restore the land to the plaintiff, nothing prevents the owner from claiming the property and the seller from being compelled to defend again.