[IDEM libro sexto ad Sabinum. ] §26.7.16.prCum quaeritur iudicio tutelae, quae nomina a tutore facta agnoscere pupillus debeat, Marcellus putabat, si tutor pecuniam pupilli mutuam dedisset et suo nomine stipulatus esset, posse dici nomina integra pupillo salua esse, deperdita et male contracta ad tutorem pertinere.
[THE SAME in the sixth book on Sabinus.] When it is questioned in an action on guardianship which claims made by the tutor the pupil ought to acknowledge, Marcellus thought that, if the tutor had lent the pupil's money and had stipulated in his own name, it could be said that the sound claims remain safe for the pupil, while those lost or badly contracted belong to the tutor.
sed uerius se putare posse tutorem eam condicionem adulescenti deferre, ut id quod gessisset tutor in contrahendis nominibus aut in totum agnoscere aut a toto recedere, ita ut perinde esset ac si tutor sibi negotium gessisset.
But he thinks it more correct that the tutor can offer this condition to the youth, that he must either acknowledge in full or withdraw entirely from what the tutor had done in contracting the claims, just as if the tutor had transacted business for himself.
idem est et si pupilli nomine credidisset.
The same is true even if he had lent the money in the name of the pupil.