[IDEM libro quinto responsorum. ] §25.3.7.prSi neget qui maritus fuisse dicitur matrimonium esse contractum eo, quod eam quae se uxorem fuisse dicit ancillam esse probare paratus sit, alimenta quidem liberis praestare interim compellendum, sin autem constiterit eam seruam fuisse, nihil ei, qui pascendos curauit, ex hoc praeiudicium generare respondi.
[THE SAME, from the fifth book of Opinions.] If he who is said to have been the husband denies that a marriage was contracted, on the ground that he is prepared to prove that she who says she was his wife is a slave, I answered that he must indeed in the meantime be compelled to provide maintenance for the children; but if it is established that she was a slave, this fact creates no prejudice to him who took care to feed them.