[IDEM libro secundo ad Urseium Ferocem. ] §24.3.32.prSi prior maritus posteriori dotis nomine tamquam debitor mulieris dotem promiserit, non plus quam id quod facere possit dotis futurum esse.
[THE SAME, Book 2 of Epitomes of Urseius Ferox.] If a former husband, as if he were a debtor of the woman, has promised a dowry to a subsequent husband in the name of a dowry, no more than what he is able to pay will become part of the dowry.