Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §24.3.31.pr-24.3.31.4
Confiscation of Property and Dowry Rights Against Heirs
Summary
This chunk addresses the wife's rights upon confiscation of the husband's property, the non-applicability of a dowry-reduction agreement to heirs, the assignment of judgment enforcement rights to the daughter, the effect of dotal payments by co-heirs on a conditional heir, and the right to sue for fruits and other accessions upon the return of dotal property.
Notes
- §24.3.31.1egerit — The subject of `egerit` is understood from the context to be the preceding `pater` (the father). It refers to the case where the father brings an action against the husband after the dissolution of the marriage, which is contrasted with the latter part where the husband is the plaintiff (`maritus agere coeperit`).
- §24.3.31.2re secundum eum iudicata — An ablative absolute construction. `secundum eum` is a legal idiom meaning "in his favor," where `eum` refers to the representative (`procurator`) appointed by the father.
- §24.3.31.3hoc minus — `hoc` is an ablative of measure of difference ("by so much"), modifying the comparative adverb `minus`, meaning "by so much less."
- §24.3.31.4non habita ratione — An ablative absolute with negation, literally "no account having been taken of," meaning "without taking into account."
Cite this passage
Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §24.3.31.pr-24.3.31.4. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:24.3.31.pr-24.3.31.4
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.