Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §23.4.12.pr-23.4.12.4
Validity of Various Pacts on Dowry Retention and Return
Summary
Paulus discusses the validity and interpretation of various agreements regarding dowries, including their retention by the husband upon the wife's death, the distinction between voluntary pacts and legal restrictions, limitations on claims with a penalty, and agreements concerning the difference between the estimated and actual sale price of land.
Notes
- §23.4.12.2uel exceptione pacti et acceptam facere poenae obligationem — In the context 'either by using the exception of the pact and releasing the obligation of the penalty,' a verb governing the ablative `exceptione` (typically `uti` 'to use') is omitted, which is coordinated with the infinitive `acceptam facere`. The phrase `acceptam facere` is a legal technical term referring to the formal release or discharge of a verbal obligation (acceptilatio).
- §23.4.12.4et id ipsum mulierem consequi — An accusative with infinitive (A.c.I.) construction, where `mulierem` is the subject accusative and `consequi` is the infinitive. The main governing verb (such as `puto` or `ait`) is omitted. It presents the logical consequence of the previous sentence `stari eo pacto oportet` or Paulus's legal opinion that 'the woman also obtains that very difference' (i.e., the loss caused by the husband's fault). `id ipsum` refers to the deficiency in the price caused by the husband's negligence.
Cite this passage
Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §23.4.12.pr-23.4.12.4. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:23.4.12.pr-23.4.12.4
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.