Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §19.5.14.pr-19.5.14.3
Property Damage Cases and Granting of Actions on the Case
Summary
This section discusses various cases of intentional or accidental damage to another's property (throwing cargo into the sea, stripping a slave who dies of cold, discarding a silver cup, and cattle consuming fallen acorns) where existing statutory or civil law actions are unavailable, thereby justifying the granting of an action on the case (actio in factum).
Notes
- 19.5.14.prnulla tenetur actione — The verb "tenetur" (passive of "tenere") is used in the legal sense of "to be held liable" or "to be bound." The noun "actione" is an ablative of instrument or cause, meaning "is bound by no action."
- 19.5.14.1criminali poena aduersus eum seruata — An ablative absolute construction using the perfect participle of "servare." It indicates that while a civil action on the case (actio in factum) is granted, the potential criminal prosecution or punishment ("poena criminalis") against the wrongdoer is not precluded but rather "reserved" or maintained for the future.
- 19.5.14.3legitimam actionem — Here, "legitima actio" (statutory or legal action) refers to a regular action based on the Law of the Twelve Tables or other specific statutes (lex). Aristo argues that since no action matching the strict requirements of established civil law is available in this specific case, one must resort to an "action on the case" (actio in factum) granted by the praetor based on equity.
Cite this passage
Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §19.5.14.pr-19.5.14.3. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:19.5.14.pr-19.5.14.3
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.