[IULIANUS libro quinto decimo digestorum. ] §19.1.24.prSi seruus, in quo usus fructus tuus erat, fundum emerit et antequam pecunia numeraretur, capite minutus fueris, quamuis pretium solueris, actionem ex empto non habebis propter talem capitis deminutionem, sed indebiti actionem aduersus uenditorem habebis.
[JULIAN, Digest, Book XV.]\n\nIf a slave in whom you had a usufruct bought land, and before the money was paid you underwent a change of status (capitis deminutio), although you paid the price, you will not have an action on purchase on account of such change of status, but you will have an action for recovery of what is not owed against the seller.
ante capitis autem minutionem nihil interest, tu soluas an seruus ex eo peculio quod ad te pertinet: nam utroque casu actionem ex empto habebis. §19.1.24.1Seruum tuum imprudens a fure bona fide emi: is ex peculio quod ad te pertinebat hominem parauit, qui mihi traditus est.
Before the change of status, however, it makes no difference whether you pay or the slave pays out of that peculium which belongs to you; for in either case you will have an action on purchase.\n\nI bought your slave in good faith from a thief, not knowing he was yours; he purchased another slave out of the peculium that belonged to you, and this slave was delivered to me.
posse te eum hominem mihi condicere Sabinus dixit, sed si quid mihi abesset ex negotio quod is gessisset, inuicem me tecum acturum de peculio.
Sabinus said that you can bring a condictio against me for that slave, but if I lost anything by the transaction which he carried out, I in turn would sue you on the peculium.
Cassius ueram opinionem Sabini rettulit, in qua ego quoque sum. §19.1.24.2Seruo uendente hominem fideiussor uenditionis omnia praestare debet, in quae obligaretur, si pro libero fideiussisset: nam et in dominum actio sic datur, ut emptor eadem consequatur, quae libero uendente consequi debuisset, sed ultra peculii taxationem dominus non condemnatur.
Cassius reported Sabinus' opinion as correct, which I also support.\n\nWhen a slave sells another slave, the surety for the sale must make good everything for which he would be liable if he had become surety for a free person; for an action is also granted against the master in such a way that the buyer obtains the same things as he ought to have obtained if a free person had been the seller, but the master is not condemned beyond the limit of the peculium.