§8.8.1ὅτι Φίλιππος παραγενόμενος εἰς τὴν Μεσσήνην ἔφθειρε τὴν χώραν δυσμενικῶς, θυμῷ τὸ πλεῖον ἢ λογισμῷ χρώμενος·
That Philip, having arrived in Messene, hostilely ravaged the country, using passion more than reason.
§8.8.2ἤλπιζε γάρ, ὡς ἐμοὶ δοκεῖ, βλάπτων συνεχῶς οὐδέποτʼ ἀγανακτήσειν οὐδὲ μισήσειν αὐτὸν τοὺς κακῶς πάσχοντας.
For he expected, as it seems to me, that those who suffered ill would never feel resentment nor hate him, even though he was continually harming them.
§8.8.3προήχθην δὲ καὶ νῦν καὶ διὰ τῆς προτέρας βύβλου σαφέστερον ἐξηγήσασθαι περὶ τούτων οὐ μόνον διὰ τὰς πρότερον ἡμῖν εἰρημένας αἰτίας, ἀλλὰ καὶ διὰ τὸ τῶν συγγραφέων τοὺς μὲν ὅλως παραλελοιπέναι τὰ κατὰ τοὺς Μεσσηνίους, §8.8.4τοὺς δὲ καθόλου διὰ τὴν πρὸς τοὺς μονάρχους εὔνοιαν ἢ τἀναντία φόβον οὐχ οἷον ἐν ἁμαρτίᾳ γεγονέναι τὴν εἰς τοὺς Μεσσηνίους ἀσέβειαν Φιλίππου καὶ παρανομίαν, ἀλλὰ τοὐναντίον ἐν ἐπαίνῳ καὶ κατορθώματι τὰ πεπραγμένα διασαφεῖν ἡμῖν.
I was led, both now and through the previous book, to give a clearer explanation of these matters, not only for the reasons previously mentioned by us, but also because some of the historians have entirely omitted the affairs of the Messenians, while others, altogether out of goodwill towards monarchs, or on the contrary, out of fear of them, far from representing Philip's impiety and lawlessness towards the Messenians as a mistake, on the contrary explain his actions to us as matters of praise and success.
§8.8.5οὐ μόνον δὲ περὶ Μεσσηνίους τοῦτο πεποιηκότας ἰδεῖν ἔστι τοὺς γράφοντας τοῦ Φιλίππου τὰς πράξεις, ἀλλὰ καὶ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων παραπλησίως.
And it is possible to see that those who write the history of Philip's deeds have done this not only regarding the Messenians, but also in a similar manner regarding others.
§8.8.6ἐξ ὧν ἱστορίας μὲν οὐδαμῶς ἔχειν αὐτοῖς συμβαίνει διάθεσιν τὰς συντάξεις, ἐγκωμίου δὲ μᾶλλον.
From which it happens that their treatises by no means have the character of history, but rather of panegyric.
§8.8.7ἐγὼ δʼ οὔτε λοιδορεῖν ψευδῶς φημι δεῖν τοὺς μονάρχους οὔτʼ ἐγκωμιάζειν, ὃ πολλοῖς ἤδη συμβέβηκε, τὸν ἀκόλουθον δὲ τοῖς προγεγραμμένοις ἀεὶ καὶ τὸν πρέποντα ταῖς ἑκάστων προαιρέσεσι λόγον ἐφαρμόζειν.
But I say that one must neither falsely abuse monarchs nor panegyrize them, which has already happened to many, but always apply an account that is consistent with what was previously written and appropriate to the choices of each.
§8.8.8ἀλλʼ ἴσως τοῦτʼ εἰπεῖν μὲν εὐμαρές, πρᾶξαι δὲ καὶ λίαν δυσχερὲς διὰ τὸ πολλὰς καὶ ποικίλας εἶναι διαθέσεις καὶ περιστάσεις, αἷς εἴκοντες ἄνθρωποι κατὰ τὸν βίον οὔτε λέγειν οὔτε γράφειν δύνανται τὸ φαινόμενον.
But perhaps this is easy to say, but extremely difficult to practice, because there are many and various dispositions and circumstances, yielding to which in their lives men can neither speak nor write what appears to be the case.
ὧν χάριν τισὶ μὲν αὐτῶν συγγνώμην δοτέον, §8.8.9ἐνίοις γε μὴν οὐ δοτέον.
For which reason pardon should be granted to some of them, and yet to others it should not be granted.