Humanitext Reader

Polybius · The Histories §5.66.1-5.66.9

Antiochus' Four-Month Truce and Complacency

Passage 430 of 1311 · Greek

Summary

Antiochus, stalled in his siege of Dora, agreed to a four-month truce with Ptolemy's envoys and withdrew to Seleucia for winter quarters, but grew negligent of military training, believing that peace would be achieved without further conflict.

§5.66.1τοιαύτη τις ἦν.
Such was its character.
Ἀντίοχος δὲ συνεσταμένος πολιορκίαν περὶ τὴν καλουμένην πόλιν Δῶρα, καὶ περαίνειν οὐδὲν δυνάμενος διά τε τὴν ὀχυρότητα τοῦ τόπου καὶ τὰς τῶν περὶ τὸν Νικόλαον παραβοηθείας, §5.66.2συνάπτοντος ἤδη τοῦ χειμῶνος, συνεχώρησε ταῖς παρὰ τοῦ Πτολεμαίου πρεσβείαις ἀνοχάς τε ποιήσασθαι τετραμήνους καὶ περὶ τῶν ὅλων εἰς πάντα συγκαταβήσεσθαι τὰ φιλάνθρωπα.
Antiochus, on his part, had been engaged in the siege of the city called Dora, and being unable to achieve anything owing both to the strength of the place and the assistance rendered by Nicolaus and his men, as winter was already approaching, he agreed with the embassies from Ptolemy to make a four months' truce, and to consent to all terms of accommodation regarding the general question.
§5.66.3ταῦτα δʼ ἔπραττε πλεῖστον μὲν ἀπέχων τῆς ἀληθείας, σπεύδων δὲ μὴ πολὺν χρόνον ἀποσπᾶσθαι τῶν οἰκείων τόπων, ἀλλʼ ἐν τῇ Σελευκείᾳ ποιήσασθαι τὴν τῶν δυνάμεων παραχειμασίαν διὰ τὸ προφανῶς τὸν Ἀχαιὸν ἐπιβουλεύειν μὲν τοῖς σφετέροις πράγμασι, συνεργεῖν δὲ τοῖς περὶ τὸν Πτολεμαῖον ὁμολογουμένως.
In doing this he was very far from acting in good faith, but was anxious not to be kept away for long from his own territories, and rather to make the winter quarters of his forces in Seleucia, because it was obvious that Achaeus was plotting against his interests and was admittedly co-operating with Ptolemy.
§5.66.4τούτων δὲ συγχωρηθέντων Ἀντίοχος τοὺς μὲν πρεσβευτὰς ἐξέπεμψε, παραγγείλας διασαφεῖν αὐτῷ τὴν ταχίστην τὰ δόξαντα τοῖς περὶ τὸν Πτολεμαῖον καὶ συνάπτειν εἰς Σελεύκειαν· §5.66.5ἀπολιπὼν δὲ φυλακὰς τὰς ἁρμοζούσας ἐν τοῖς τόποις, καὶ παραδοὺς Θεοδότῳ τὴν τῶν ὅλων ἐπιμέλειαν, ἐπανῆλθε· καὶ παραγενόμενος εἰς τὴν Σελεύκειαν διαφῆκε τὰς δυνάμεις εἰς παραχειμασίαν.
These terms having been agreed upon, Antiochus sent away the envoys, bidding them inform him as quickly as possible of the decisions of Ptolemy and his advisers, and to join him at Seleucia; and leaving suitable garrisons in those places, and handing over the general administration to Theodotus, he returned; and arriving at Seleucia, he dismissed his forces to their winter quarters.
§5.66.6καὶ τὸ λοιπὸν ἤδη τοῦ μὲν γυμνάζειν τοὺς ὄχλους ὠλιγώρει, πεπεισμένος οὐ προσδεήσεσθαι τὰ πράγματα μάχης διὰ τὸ τινῶν μὲν μερῶν Κοίλης Συρίας καὶ Φοινίκης ἤδη κυριεύειν, τοὺς δὲ λοιποὺς ἐλπίζειν ἐξ ἑκόντων καὶ διὰ λόγου παραλήψεσθαι, §5.66.7μὴ τολμώντων τὸ παράπαν τῶν περὶ τὸν Πτολεμαῖον εἰς τὸν περὶ τῶν ὅλων συγκαταβαίνειν κίνδυνον.
Henceforth he neglected the training of his troops, being convinced that the situation would not require a battle, because he was already in possession of certain parts of Coele-Syria and Phoenicia, and hoped to receive the rest voluntarily and by negotiation, since Ptolemy's party would not dare at all to encounter the risk of a general conflict.
§5.66.8ταύτην δὲ συνέβαινε τὴν διάληψιν καὶ τοὺς πρεσβευτὰς ἔχειν διὰ τὸ τὰς ἐντεύξεις αὐτοῖς τὸν Σωσίβιον ἐν τῇ Μέμφει προκαθήμενον φιλανθρώπους ποιεῖσθαι, §5.66.9τῶν δὲ κατὰ τὴν Ἀλεξάνδρειαν παρασκευῶν μηδέποτε τοὺς διαπεμπομένους πρὸς τὸν Ἀντίοχον ἐᾶν αὐτόπτας γενέσθαι.
And it happened that the envoys also held this same view, because Sosibius, residing in Memphis, conducted his interviews with them in a friendly manner, and never allowed those dispatched to Antiochus to become eyewitnesses of the preparations going on in Alexandria.

Notes

  1. §5.66.1συνεσταμένος πολιορκίαν — The perfect middle participle συνεσταμένος (from συνίστημι) is used transitively with the accusative object πολιορκίαν to mean 'having engaged in or undertaken a siege.'
  2. §5.66.2συγκαταβήσεσθαι τὰ φιλάνθρωπα — The future infinitive συγκαταβήσεσθαι (from συγκαταβαίνω, meaning to yield or agree to terms) governs τὰ φιλάνθρωπα (terms of accommodation or friendly proposals) to express readiness to make concessions in the general negotiations.
  3. §5.66.3ἀπέχων τῆς ἀληθείας — Literally meaning 'being very far from the truth,' this is an idiomatic expression indicating that Antiochus was acting in bad faith or insincerely during the peace negotiations.
  4. §5.66.6τοὺς δὲ λοιποὺς — In the clause introduced by ἐλπίζειν, τοὺς δὲ λοιποὺς functions as the accusative object of the future infinitive παραλήψεσθαι (referring to the remaining territories). The subject of the infinitive is omitted as it is identical to the main subject (Antiochus).
  5. §5.66.8συνέβαινε τὴν διάληψιν καὶ τοὺς πρεσβευτὰς ἔχειν — The impersonal verb συνέβαινε (it happened that) takes the accusative-with-infinitive construction τοὺς πρεσβευτὰς ἔχειν τὴν διάληψιν (that the envoys held this view) as its logical subject.

Cite this passage

Polybius, The Histories §5.66.1-5.66.9. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0543.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:5.66.1-5.66.9

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.