Humanitext Reader

Polybius · The Histories §2.37.1-2.37.11

Unification of the Peloponnese by the Achaean League

Passage 125 of 1311 · Greek

Summary

Polybius explains his intention to shift his focus from the preliminary narratives to the affairs of Greece as he begins his systematic history. He particularly highlights the extraordinary political unification of the Peloponnese achieved by the Achaean League in his own times.

§2.37.1κατὰ δὲ τοὺς αὐτοὺς καιροὺς Ἀχαιοὶ καὶ Φίλιππος ὁ βασιλεὺς ἅμα τοῖς ἄλλοις συμμάχοις συνίσταντο τὸν πρὸς Αἰτωλοὺς πόλεμον τὸν προσαγορευθέντα συμμαχικόν.
At about the same time, the Achaeans and King Philip, together with their other allies, entered upon the war against the Aetolians, which was called the Social War.
§2.37.2ἡμεῖς δʼ ἐπειδὴ τάς τε περὶ Σικελίαν καὶ Λιβύην καὶ τὰς ἑξῆς πράξεις διεξιόντες κατὰ τὸ συνεχὲς τῆς προκατασκευῆς ἥκομεν ἐπὶ τὴν ἀρχὴν τοῦ τε συμμαχικοῦ καὶ τοῦ δευτέρου συστάντος μὲν Ῥωμαίοις καὶ Καρχηδονίοις πολέμου, προσαγορευθέντος δὲ παρὰ τοῖς πλείστοις Ἀννιβιακοῦ, κατὰ δὲ τὴν ἐξ ἀρχῆς πρόθεσιν ἀπὸ τούτων τῶν καιρῶν ἐπηγγειλάμεθα ποιήσασθαι τὴν ἀρχὴν τῆς ἑαυτῶν συντάξεως, §2.37.3πρέπον ἂν εἴη τούτων ἀφεμένους ἐπὶ τὰς κατὰ τὴν Ἑλλάδα μεταβαίνειν πράξεις, ἵνα πανταχόθεν ὁμοίαν ποιησάμενοι τὴν προκατασκευὴν καὶ τὴν ἔφοδον ἐπὶ τοὺς αὐτοὺς καιροὺς οὕτως ἤδη [τῆς Ἰταλίας καὶ] τῆς ἀποδεικτικῆς ἱστορίας ἀρχώμεθα.
Since we, in detailing the events of Sicily and Libya and those that followed in the continuous course of our preliminary narrative, have now arrived at the beginning of the Social War and of the second war that arose between the Romans and the Carthaginians, which is called by most the Hannibalian War, and since according to our original plan we promised to make the beginning of our own history from these times, it would be fitting for us to leave these for a moment and pass to the affairs of Greece, in order that, having made our preliminary narrative and approach from all sides uniform up to the same period, we may then begin our systematic history.
§2.37.4ἐπεὶ γὰρ οὐ τινὰς πράξεις, καθάπερ οἱ πρὸ ἡμῶν, οἷον τὰς Ἑλληνικὰς ἢ Περσικάς, ὁμοῦ δὲ τὰς ἐν τοῖς γνωριζομένοις μέρεσι τῆς οἰκουμένης ἀναγράφειν ἐπικεχειρήκαμεν διὰ τὸ πρὸς τοῦτο τὸ μέρος τῆς ὑποθέσεως ἴδιόν τι συμβεβλῆσθαι τοὺς καθʼ ἡμᾶς καιρούς, ὑπὲρ ὧν σαφέστερον ἐν ἑτέροις δηλώσομεν, §2.37.5δέον ἂν εἴη καὶ πρὸ τῆς κατασκευῆς ἐπὶ βραχὺ τῶν ἐπιφανεστάτων καὶ γνωριζομένων ἐθνῶν καὶ τόπων ἐφάψασθαι τῆς οἰκουμένης.
For since we have undertaken to write, not the history of particular transactions, like our predecessors, such as those of Greece or Persia, but the history of all events together in the known parts of the inhabited world—because our own times have contributed something peculiar to this part of our scheme, about which we shall speak more clearly elsewhere— it would be necessary, even before building our narrative, to touch briefly upon the most illustrious and well-known nations and places of the inhabited world.
§2.37.6περὶ μὲν οὖν τῶν κατὰ τὴν Ἀσίαν καὶ τῶν κατὰ τὴν Αἴγυπτον ἀρκούντως ἂν ἔχοι ποιεῖσθαι τὴν ἀνάμνησιν ἀπὸ τῶν νῦν ῥηθέντων καιρῶν διὰ τὸ τὴν μὲν ὑπὲρ τῶν προγεγονότων παρʼ αὐτοῖς ἱστορίαν ὑπὸ πλειόνων ἐκδεδόσθαι καὶ γνώριμον ὑπάρχειν ἅπασιν, ἐν δὲ τοῖς καθʼ ἡμᾶς καιροῖς μηδὲν αὐτοῖς ἐξηλλαγμένον ἀπηντῆσθαι μηδὲ παράλογον ὑπὸ τῆς τύχης ὥστε προσδεῖσθαι τῆς τῶν προγεγονότων ὑπομνήσεως.
Now, regarding the affairs of Asia and Egypt, it would be sufficient to make our review from the times just mentioned, because the history of their past has been published by many and is known to all, and in our own times nothing extraordinary or unexpected has been brought upon them by Fortune so as to require a reminder of their past.
§2.37.7περὶ δὲ τοῦ τῶν Ἀχαιῶν ἔθνους καὶ περὶ τῆς Μακεδόνων οἰκίας ἁρμόσει διὰ βραχέων ἀναδραμεῖν τοῖς χρόνοις, ἐπειδὴ περὶ μὲν ταύτην ὁλοσχερὴς ἐπαναίρεσις, §2.37.8περὶ δὲ τοὺς Ἀχαιούς, καθάπερ ἐπάνω προεῖπον, παράδοξος αὔξησις καὶ συμφρόνησις ἐν τοῖς καθʼ ἡμᾶς καιροῖς γέγονε.
But in the case of the Achaean nation and of the royal house of Macedonia, it will be appropriate to run back briefly in time, since as regards the latter there has been a complete ruin, and as regards the Achaeans, as I said above, an extraordinary growth and unification has taken place in our own times.
§2.37.9πολλῶν γὰρ ἐπιβαλομένων ἐν τοῖς παρεληλυθόσι χρόνοις ἐπὶ ταὐτὸ συμφέρον ἀγαγεῖν Πελοποννησίους, οὐδενὸς δὲ καθικέσθαι δυνηθέντος διὰ τὸ μὴ τῆς κοινῆς ἐλευθερίας ἕνεκεν ἀλλὰ τῆς σφετέρας δυναστείας χάριν ἑκάστους ποιεῖσθαι τὴν σπουδήν, §2.37.10τοιαύτην καὶ τηλικαύτην ἐν τοῖς καθʼ ἡμᾶς καιροῖς ἔσχε προκοπὴν καὶ συντέλειαν τοῦτο τὸ μέρος ὥστε μὴ μόνον συμμαχικὴν καὶ φιλικὴν κοινωνίαν γεγονέναι πραγμάτων περὶ αὐτούς, ἀλλὰ καὶ νόμοις χρῆσθαι τοῖς αὐτοῖς καὶ σταθμοῖς καὶ μέτροις καὶ νομίσμασι, πρὸς δὲ τούτοις ἄρχουσι, βουλευταῖς, §2.37.11δικασταῖς, τοῖς αὐτοῖς, καθόλου δὲ τούτῳ μόνῳ διαλλάττειν τοῦ μὴ μιᾶς πόλεως διάθεσιν ἔχειν σχεδὸν τὴν σύμπασαν Πελοπόννησον, τῷ μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν περίβολον ὑπάρχειν τοῖς κατοικοῦσιν αὐτήν, τἄλλα δʼ εἶναι καὶ κοινῇ καὶ κατὰ πόλεις ἑκάστοις ταὐτὰ καὶ παραπλήσια.
For though many in past times had attempted to lead the Peloponnesians to a common interest, yet no one was able to succeed, because they each made their efforts not for the sake of common liberty, but for the sake of their own domination; but in our times this part of the world has made such and so great progress and attainment, that not only has there been formed among them a league of alliance and friendship in affairs, but they also use the same laws, weights, measures, and coins, and moreover the same magistrates, councillors, and judges; and, in a word, the whole of Peloponnesus differs from having the character of a single city in this point alone, that its inhabitants do not possess the same enclosing wall, while in all other respects, both collectively and for each city individually, everything is identical or nearly similar.

Notes

  1. 2.37.2ἡμεῖς δʼ ἐπειδὴ ... πρέπον ἂν εἴη — The core structure begins with `ἡμεῖς δʼ ἐπειδὴ` ("since we...") in §2.37.2, and after several parenthetical clauses and relative clauses, it finds its main clause in §2.37.3 with `πρέπον ἂν εἴη` ("it would be fitting"), an impersonal construction with the potential optative. The subject of the infinitive `μεταβαίνειν` is the implicit "we" (`ἡμεῖς`), as indicated by the accusative plural participle `ἀφεμένους`.
  2. 2.37.5δέον ἂν εἴη — The neuter participle `δέον` of the impersonal verb `δεῖ` ("it is necessary") is combined with the potential optative `ἂν εἴη`. While `δέον` is commonly used alone in the accusative absolute, here it functions predicatively with `ἂν εἴη` to express a potential necessity ("it would be necessary").
  3. 2.37.9πολλῶν γὰρ ἐπιβαλομένων ... οὐδενὸς δὲ καθικέσθαι δυνηθέντος — Two genitive absolute constructions are coordinate here after `γάρ`. The first `πολλῶν ἐπιβαλομένων` ("although many attempted") is contrasted via `δέ` with `οὐδενὸς δυνηθέντος` ("yet no one was able").
  4. 2.37.11διαλλάττειν τοῦ μὴ μιᾶς πόλεως διάθεσιν ἔχειν ... τῷ μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν περίβολον ὑπάρχειν — The infinitive `διαλλάττειν` ("to differ"), governed by `ὥστε` in §2.37.10, forms the core of this phrase. The genitive of comparison `τοῦ μὴ ... ἔχει` ("from having the character of [not] a single city") indicates the point of difference, while the dative of cause/respect `τῷ μὴ ... ὑπάρχειν` ("by the fact of not having the same wall") explains the reason.

Cite this passage

Polybius, The Histories §2.37.1-2.37.11. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0543.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:2.37.1-2.37.11

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.