§12.8.1ἢ δεικτέον οὖν τὸν Ἀριστοτέλην κατὰ τὸν ἄρτι λόγον τὰ περὶ Λοκρῶν εἰρηκότα χάριτος ἢ κέρδους ἢ διαφορᾶς ἕνεκεν ἢ μηδὲ τολμῶντας τοῦτο λέγειν ὁμολογητέον ἀγνοεῖν καὶ παραπαίειν τοὺς τοιαύτῃ χρωμένους ἀπεχθείᾳ καὶ πικρίᾳ κατὰ τῶν πέλας οἵᾳ κέχρηται Τίμαιος κατʼ Ἀριστοτέλους.
Therefore, we must either show that Aristotle, according to our recent argument, spoke about the Locrians for the sake of favor, gain, or private feud, or, if we do not even dare to say this, we must admit that those who employ such animosity and bitterness against their neighbors as Timaeus has employed against Aristotle, are ignorant and out of their minds.
§12.8.2φησὶ γὰρ αὐτὸν εἶναι θρασύν, εὐχερῆ, προπετῆ, πρὸς δὲ τούτοις κατατετολμηκέναι τῆς τῶν Λοκρῶν πόλεως, εἰπόντα τὴν ἀποικίαν αὐτῶν εἶναι δραπετῶν, οἰκετῶν, μοιχῶν, ἀνδραποδιστῶν.
For he says that he is impudent, reckless, and headstrong, and moreover that he has behaved with utter audacity towards the city of the Locrians, by saying that their colony consisted of runaway slaves, servants, adulterers, and kidnappers.
§12.8.3καὶ ταῦτα λέγειν αὐτόν φησιν οὕτως ἀξιοπίστως ὥστε δοκεῖν ἕνα τῶν ἐστρατηγηκότων ὑπάρχειν καὶ τοὺς Πέρσας ἐν ταῖς Κιλικίαις πύλαις ἄρτι παρατάξει νενικηκότα διὰ τῆς αὑτοῦ δυνάμεως, §12.8.4ἀλλʼ οὐ σοφιστὴν ὀψιμαθῆ καὶ μισητὸν ὑπάρχοντα καὶ τὸ πολυτίμητον ἰατρεῖον ἀρτίως ἀποκεκλεικότα, πρὸς δὲ τούτοις εἰς πᾶσαν αὐλὴν καὶ σκηνὴν ἐμπεπηδηκότα, πρὸς δὲ γαστρίμαργον, ὀψαρτυτήν, ἐπὶ στόμα φερόμενον ἐν πᾶσι.
And he says that he speaks of these things with such an air of authority as to seem to be one of those who have held military command, and to have just defeated the Persians at the Cilician Gates in a pitched battle by his own power, and not a late-learning and detestable sophist, who has just closed his precious surgeon's shop, and furthermore has forced his way into every palace and stage, and is besides a glutton, a chef, carrying his mouth forward in everything.
§12.8.5δοκεῖ δή μοι τὰ τοιαῦτα μόλις ἂν ἄνθρωπος ἀγύρτης καὶ προπετὴς ἐπὶ δικαστηρίου ῥιψολογῶν ἀνεκτὸς φανῆναι· μέτριος μὲν γὰρ οὐ δοκεῖ.
It seems to me indeed that such language would scarcely be tolerated from some vulgar quack pouring out abuse in a court of justice; for moderate it certainly does not seem.
§12.8.6συγγραφεὺς δὲ κοινῶν πράξεων καὶ προστάτης ἱστορίας ἀληθινὸς οὐδʼ ἂν αὐτὸς ἐν αὑτῷ διανοηθῆναι μή τι δὴ καὶ γράφειν τολμήσαι τοιοῦτον.
But a writer of public transactions and a true champion of history would not even dare to think such things to himself, let alone to write them.