Humanitext Reader

Pausanias · Description of Greece §4.6.1-4.6.6

Sources on the War and Messenian Resolve at Stenyclerus

Passage 145 of 465 · Greek

Summary

Pausanias analyzes the differing accounts of Rhianus and Myron regarding the Messenian War and the chronology of Aristomenes, and then describes how the Messenians gathered at Stenyclerus and were encouraged by their king to continue the struggle.

§4.6.1πρὶν δὲ ἢ συγγράφειν με τὸν πόλεμον καὶ ὁπόσα πολεμοῦσιν ἑκατέροις ὁ δαίμων παθεῖν ἢ δρᾶσαι παρεσκεύασε, διακρῖναί τι καὶ ἡλικίας πέρι ἠθέλησα ἀνδρὸς Μεσσηνίου.
Before I write of the war and all that the deity prepared for both sides to suffer or to do as they fought, I wished to settle something also concerning the age of a certain Messenian.
τὸν γὰρ πόλεμον τοῦτον γενόμενον μὲν Λακεδαιμονίων καὶ τῶν συμμάχων πρὸς Μεσσηνίους καὶ τοὺς ἐπικούρους, ὀνομασθέντα δὲ οὐκ ἀπὸ τῶν ἐπιστρατευσάντων ὥσπερ γε ὁ Μηδικὸς καὶ ὁ Πελοποννήσιος, Μεσσήνιον δὲ ἀπὸ τῶν συμφορῶν, καθὰ δὴ καὶ τὸν ἐπὶ Ἰλίῳ κληθῆναι Τρωικὸν καὶ οὐχ Ἑλληνικὸν ἐξενίκησεν, τοῦτον τῶν Μεσσηνίων τὸν πόλεμον Ῥιανός τε ἐν τοῖς ἔπεσιν ἐποίησεν ὁ Βηναῖος καὶ ὁ Πριηνεὺς Μύρων· λόγοι δὲ πεζοὶ Μύρωνός ἐστιν ἡ συγγραφή.
For this war, waged indeed by the Lacedaemonians and their allies against the Messenians and their auxiliaries, and named not after those who made the expedition as was the Persian or the Peloponnesian war, but Messenian after those who suffered the disasters (just as that against Ilium won the name of Trojan and not Greek), this Messenian war was treated by Rhianus of Bene in his epic poems and by Myron of Priene; Myron's work is a prose history.
§4.6.2συνεχῶς μὲν δὴ τὰ πάντα ἐξ ἀρχῆς ἐς τοῦ πολέμου τὴν τελευτὴν οὐδετέρῳ διήνυσται·
Indeed, neither of them has completed the whole account continuously from the beginning to the end of the war; but each treated the part that pleased him.
μέρος δὲ ᾧ ἑκάτερος ἠρέσκετο, ὁ μὲν τῆς τε Ἀμφείας τὴν ἅλωσιν καὶ τὰ ἐφεξῆς συνέθηκεν οὐ πρόσω τῆς Ἀριστοδήμου τελευτῆς, Ῥιανὸς δὲ τοῦδε μὲν τοῦ πρώτου τῶν πολέμων οὐδὲ ἥψατο ἀρχήν· ὁπόσα δὲ χρόνῳ συνέβη τοῖς Μεσσηνίοις ἀποστᾶσιν ἀπὸ Λακεδαιμονίων, ὁ δὲ καὶ ταῦτα μὲν οὐ τὰ πάντα ἔγραψε, τῆς μάχης δὲ τὰ ὕστερα ἣν ἐμαχέσαντο ἐπὶ τῇ τάφρῳ τῇ καλουμένῃ Μεγάλῃ.
One composed the capture of Ampheia and the subsequent events up to not far from the death of Aristodemus, while Rhianus did not even touch upon this first of the wars at all; but of all that happened in time to the Messenians when they revolted from the Lacedaemonians, even of these things he did not write all, but of what followed the battle which they fought at the so-called Great Trench.
§4.6.3ἄνδρα οὖν Μεσσήνιον—τούτου γὰρ δὴ ἕνεκα τὸν πάντα ἐποιησάμην Ῥιανοῦ καὶ Μύρωνος λόγον—Ἀριστομένην, ὃς καὶ πρῶτος καὶ μάλιστα τὸ Μεσσήνης ὄνομα ἐς ἀξίωμα προήγαγε, τοῦτον τὸν ἄνδρα ἐπεισήγαγε μὲν ὁ Πριηνεὺς ἐς τὴν συγγραφήν, Ῥιανῷ δὲ ἐν τοῖς ἔπεσιν οὐδὲν Ἀριστομένης ἐστὶν ἀφανέστερος ἢ Ἀχιλλεὺς ἐν Ἰλιάδι Ὁμήρῳ.
Therefore, regarding a certain Messenian man—for it was for his sake indeed that I entered into this whole discussion of Rhianus and Myron—Aristomenes, who first and foremost raised the name of Messene to renown, this man the Prienean introduced into his history, while in the epic of Rhianus, Aristomenes is no less prominent than Achilles is in Homer's Iliad.
διάφορα οὖν ἐπὶ τοσοῦτον εἰρηκότων, προσέσθαι μὲν τὸν ἕτερόν μοι τῶν λόγων καὶ οὐχ ἅμα ἀμφοτέρους ὑπελείπετο, Ῥιανὸς δέ μοι ποιῆσαι μᾶλλον ἐφαίνετο εἰκότα ἐς τὴν Ἀριστομένους ἡλικίαν·
Since they have said things so different, it was left for me to accept one of the accounts and not both at once; and Rhianus seemed to me to make a more probable statement regarding the age of Aristomenes.
§4.6.4Μύρωνα δὲ ἐπί τε ἄλλοις καταμαθεῖν ἔστιν οὐ προορώμενον εἰ ψευδῆ τε καὶ οὐ πιθανὰ δόξει λέγειν καὶ οὐχ ἥκιστα ἐν τῇδε τῇ Μεσσηνίᾳ συγγραφῇ.
And Myron can be detected in other matters as not looking forward to whether he will seem to tell falsehoods and improbable things, and not least in this Messenian history.
πεποίηκε γὰρ ὡς ἀποκτείνειε Θεόπομπον τῶν Λακεδαιμονίων τὸν βασιλέα Ἀριστομένης ὀλίγον πρὸ τῆς Ἀριστοδήμου τελευτῆς· Θεόπομπον δὲ οὔτε μάχης γινομένης οὔτε ἄλλως προαποθανόντα ἴσμεν πρὶν ἢ διαπολεμηθῆναι τὸν πόλεμον.
For he has represented Aristomenes as killing Theopompus, the king of the Lacedaemonians, a little before the death of Aristodemus; whereas we know that Theopompus was neither killed in battle nor died otherwise before the war was brought to an end.
§4.6.5οὗτος δὲ ὁ Θεόπομπος· ἦν καὶ ὁ πέρας ἐπιθεὶς τῷ πολέμῳ· μαρτυρεῖ δέ μοι καὶ τὰ ἐλεγεῖα τῶν Τυρταίου λέγοντα " ἡμετέρῳ βασιλῆι θεοῖσι φίλῳ Θεοπόμπῳ, ὃν διὰ Μεσσήνην εἵλομεν εὐρύχορον. " ὁ τοίνυν Ἀριστομένης δόξῃ γε ἐμῇ γέγονεν ἐπὶ τοῦ πολέμου τοῦ ὑστέρου· καὶ τὰ ἐς αὐτόν, ἐπειδὰν ἐς τοῦτο ὁ λόγος ἀφίκηται, τηνικαῦτα ἐπέξειμι.
And this Theopompus was indeed the one who put an end to the war; and the elegiac verses of Tyrtaeus bear witness to me, saying: "To our king, dear to the gods, Theopompus, through whom we took wide Messene." Therefore, in my opinion, Aristomenes lived at the time of the later war; and I will detail what concerns him when my account arrives at that point.
§4.6.6οἱ δὲ Μεσσήνιοι τότε, ὡς τὰ περὶ τὴν Ἄμφειαν ἤκουον παρʼ αὐτῶν τῶν ἀποσωθέντων ἐκ τῆς ἁλώσεως, συνελέγοντο ἐς Στενύκληρον ἀπὸ τῶν πόλεων.
Meanwhile, the Messenians at that time, when they heard of the events at Ampheia from those who had escaped from the capture, gathered to Stenyclerus from their cities.
ἀθροισθέντος δὲ ἐς ἐκκλησίαν τοῦ δήμου καὶ ἄλλοι τῶν ἐν τέλει καὶ τελευταῖος ὁ βασιλεὺς παρεκελεύετο μήτε τῆς Ἀμφείας καταπεπλῆχθαι τὴν πόρθησιν, ὡς τὸν πάντα ἤδη κεκριμένον διʼ αὐτῆς πόλεμον, μήτε ὡς τῆς σφετέρας κρείσσονα τῶν Λακεδαιμονίων δεδοικέναι τὴν παρασκευήν· μελέτην μὲν γὰρ ἐκείνοις τῶν πολεμικῶν ἐκ χρόνου πλείονος, σφίσι δὲ εἶναι τήν τε ἀνάγκην ἰσχυροτέραν ἀνδράσιν ἀγαθοῖς γίνεσθαι καὶ τὸ εὐμενέστερον ἔσεσθαι παρὰ τῶν θεῶν ἀμύνουσι τῇ οἰκείᾳ καὶ οὐκ ἀδικίας ἄρχουσιν.
And when the people were assembled in the assembly, other magistrates and finally the king exhorted them neither to be terrified by the sacking of Ampheia, as if the whole war had already been decided by it, nor to fear the preparation of the Lacedaemonians as being superior to their own; for while the enemy had longer practice in military affairs, they themselves had a stronger necessity to show themselves brave men, and would receive greater goodwill from the gods as they were defending their own land and had not begun the injustice.

Notes

  1. 4.6.1πρὶν δὲ ἢ συγγράφειν με — Since the main clause (ἠθέλησα) is affirmative, πρὶν (ἢ) is followed by an infinitive with an accusative subject (με συγγράφειν), meaning 'before I write...'.
  2. 4.6.1πολεμῦσιν ἑκατέροις — This is a present participle in the dative, modifying the pronoun ἑκατέροις ('for both sides as they fought'), which functions as the dative complement of παρεσκεύασε.
  3. 4.6.2ἀρχήν — An adverbial accusative used in combination with a negative expression (οὐδέ) to mean 'at all' or 'not in the least'.
  4. 4.6.4προαποθανόντα — A participle of indirect discourse dependent on the verb ἴσμεν ('we know'). It agrees in the accusative with the subject Θεόπομπον, meaning 'we do not know that Theopompus died beforehand'.
  5. 4.6.6καταπεπλῆχθαι — An infinitive of indirect command dependent on the main verb παρεκελεύετο ('exhorted'). It is a perfect passive infinitive, with τὴν πόρθησιν ('the sacking') as its subject.

Cite this passage

Pausanias, Description of Greece §4.6.1-4.6.6. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0525.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:4.6.1-4.6.6

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.