Humanitext Reader

Theophrastus · Fragments §26b.1

Possibility of Motion and Alteration Occurring All at Once

Passage 16 of 196 · Greek

Summary

It is shown that Theophrastus holds the same view in the first book of *On Motion*, questioning whether it is possible to say, regarding both ongoing and completed motion, that change does not always begin with the half but can sometimes occur all at once, as in the case of alteration in bodies.

§26b.1Fr. 26b Καὶ ὁ Θ. δὲ ἐν τῷ α´ περὶ Κινήσεως τὰ αὐτὰ ταῦτα περὶ τούτων δοξάζων φαίνεται.
Fr. 26b And Theophrastus too, in the first book of *On Motion*, appears to hold these very same opinions about these things.
Λέγει δὲ οὕτως· Ὑπὲρ δὲ τοῦ κινεῖσθαι τὸ κινούμενον καὶ κεκινῆσθαι τὸ κεκινημένον δεῖν ἄρα γε ἐνδέχεται λέγειν ὃ καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν σωμάτων κατὰ τὴν ἀλλοίωσιν, ὡς οὐκ ἀεὶ τὸ ἥμισυ πρῶτον, ἀλλʼ ἐνίοτε ἀθρόον γε.
And he says the following: 'But concerning the fact that what is in motion is moving, and what has moved has completed its motion, is it perhaps possible to say that it is necessary [to assert] what also happens in the case of bodies with respect to alteration, namely that the half is not always first, but sometimes [the change occurs] all at once?'

Notes

  1. §26b.1ὑπὲρ δὲ τοῦ κινεῖσθαι τὸ κινούμενον καὶ κεκινῆσθαι τὸ κεκινημένον — An articular infinitive clause in the genitive case introduced by the preposition ὑπέρ ('concerning'). The single genitive article τοῦ governs two coordinate clauses consisting of an accusative subject and an infinitive: 'τὸ κινούμενον κινεῖσθαι' (that what is in motion is moving) and 'τὸ κεκινημένον κεκινῆσθαι' (that what has moved is in a state of having completed its motion). The present infinitive κινεῖσθαι indicates an ongoing process, while the perfect infinitive κεκινῆσθαι denotes the completed state of motion.
  2. §26b.1δεῖν ἄρα γε ἐνδέχεται λέγειν — The infinitive δεῖν ('to be necessary') functions as the subject (or complement) of the impersonal verb ἐνδέχεται ('it is possible'), forming the sense 'is it possible that it is necessary [to say...]'. The particles ἄρα γε introduce a tentative or investigative question regarding the logical consequence.
  3. §26b.1ὡς οὐκ ἀεὶ τὸ ἥμισυ πρῶτον, ἀλλʼ ἐνίοτε ἀθρόον γε — An explanatory ὡς clause specifying the content of the preceding relative pronoun ὃ. As indicated by the phrase κατὰ τὴν ἀλλοίωσιν ('with respect to alteration'), it describes a situation where the process of change does not always proceed continuously by passing through the half (τὸ ἥμισυ) first, but can sometimes occur all at once (ἀθρόον) as a whole. The verb (e.g., 'changes') is ellipted and must be supplied from the context.

Cite this passage

Theophrastus, Fragments §26b.1. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0093.tlg010x09.humanitext-grc1:26b.1

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.