§7.2Οἱ μὲν οὖν πρὸς ταὐτὸν τόποι τοσοῦτοι λέγονται.
So then, the topics relating to identity are said to be so many.
Δῆλον δ᾿ ἐκ τῶν εἰρημένων ὅτι ἅπαντες οἱ πρὸς ταὐτὸν ἀνασκευαστικοὶ τόποι καὶ πρὸς ὅρον χρήσιμοι, καθάπερ ἔμπροσθεν εἴρηται· εἰ γὰρ μὴ ταὐτὸν δηλοῖ τό τ᾿ ὄνομα καὶ ὁ λόγος, δῆλον ὅτι οὐκ ἂν εἴη ὁρισμὸς ὁ ἀποδοθεὶς λόγος.
But it is clear from what has been said that all the destructive topics relating to identity are also useful for definition, just as was said before; for if the name and the formula do not signify the same thing, it is clear that the rendered formula would not be a definition.
Τῶν δὲ κατασκευαστικῶν τόπων οὐδεὶς χρήσιμος πρὸς ὅρον· οὐ γὰρ ἀπόχρη δεῖξαι ταὐτὸν τὸ ὑπὸ τὸν λόγον καὶ τοὔνομα πρὸς τὸ κατασκευάσαι ὅτι ὁρισμός, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὰ ἄλλα πάντα δεῖ ἔχεῖν τὰ παρηγγελμένα τὸν ὁρισμόν.
On the other hand, none of the constructive topics is useful for definition; for it is not enough to show that what is under the formula and the name are the same in order to establish that it is a definition, but it is also necessary for the formula to have all the other characteristics that are prescribed for a definition.