Humanitext Reader

Aristotle · Parts of Animals §2.3.4-2.3.7

Nutrient Absorption by the Gut and the Transport of Blood

Passage 18 of 84 · Greek

Summary

The text explains how the stomach and intestines serve as the receptacle of food (analogous to the earth for plants) and how blood vessels carry the ultimate nutrient, blood, to the body. Blood itself is an insentient residue, contained in the heart and vessels like a receptacle.

§2.3.4ὥσπερ δὲ καὶ τὸ στόμα τῆς ἀκατεργάστου 4 τροφῆς πόρος ἐστί, καὶ τὸ συνεχὲς αὐτῷ μόριον ὃ καλοῦσιν οἰσοφάγον, ὅσα τῶν ζῴων ἔχει τοῦτο τὸ μόριον, ἕως εἰς τὴν κοιλίαν, οὕτω καὶ ἄλλας ἀρχὰς δεῖ πλείους εἶναι, διʼ ὧν ἅπαν λήψεται τὸ σῶμα τὴν τροφὴν, ὥσπερ ἐκ φάτνης, ἐκ τῆς κοιλίας καὶ τῆς τῶν ἐντέρων φύσεως.
Just as the mouth is the passage for unprocessed 4 food, and the part continuous with it which they call the esophagus (in as many of the animals as have this part) as far as the stomach, so also there must be other multiple principles, through which the whole body will receive food, as if from a manger, from the stomach and the nature of the intestines.
§2.3.5τὰ μὲν γὰρ φυτὰ 5λαμβάνει τὴν τροφὴν κατειργασμένην ἐκ τῆς γῆς ταῖς ῥίζαις (διὸ καὶ περίττωμα οὐ γένεται τοῖς φυτοῖς· τῇ γὰρ γῇ καὶ τῇ ἐν αὐτῇ θερμότητι χρῆται ὥσπερ κοιλίᾳ), τὰ δὲ ξῷα πάντα μὶν σχεδόν, τὰ δὲ πορευτικὰ φανερῶς, οἷον γῆν ἐν αὑτοῖς ἔχει τὸ τῆς κοιλίας κύτος, έξ ἧς, ὥσπερ ἐκεῖνα ταῖς ῥίζαις, ταῦτα δεῖ τινὶ τὴν τροφὴν λαμβάνειν, ἕως τὸ τῆς ἐχομένης πέψεως λάβῃ τέλος.
For plants 5 receive their food already processed from the earth by their roots (wherefore also no residue occurs in plants; for they use the earth and the heat in it as a stomach), but all animals almost, and those that walk visibly, have the cavity of the stomach as a sort of earth within themselves, from which, just as those plants do by their roots, these must receive food by some means, until the subsequent concoction has its end.
ἡ μὲν γὰρ τοῦ στόματος ἐργασία παραδίδωσι τῇ κοιλίᾳ, παρὰ δὲ ταύτης ἕτερον ἀναγκαῖον καῖον λαμβάνειν, ὅπερ συμβέβηκεν· αἱ γὰρ φλέβες κατατείνονται διὰ τού μεσεντερίου παράπαν, κάτωθεν ἀρξάμεναι μέχρι τῆς κοιλίας.
For the working of the mouth delivers food to the stomach, but from this it is necessary for another thing to receive it, which indeed has happened; for the blood vessels extend completely through the mesentery, beginning from below up to the stomach.
δεῖ δὲ ταῦτα θεωρεῖν ἔκ τε τῶν ἀνατομῶν καὶ τῆς φυσικῆς ἱστορίας.
And we must observe these things both from dissection and from natural history.
§2.3.66 ἐπεὶ δὲ πάσης τροφῆς ἐστί τι δεκτικὸν καὶ τῶν γινομένων περιττωμάτων, αἱ δὲ φλέβες οἷον ἀγγεῖον αἵματός εἰσι, φανερὸν ὅτι τὸ αἷμα ἡ τελευταία τροφὴ τοῖς ζῴοις τοῖς ἐναίμοις ἐστί, τοῖς δʼ ἀυαίμοις τὸ ἀνάλογον.
6 And since there is a receptacle for all food and for the residues that occur, and blood vessels are as it were a vessel of blood, it is manifest that blood is the ultimate food for blooded animals, and for bloodless animals the analogue.
καὶ διὰ τοῦτο μὴ λαμβάνουσί τε τροφὴν ὑπολείπει τοῦτο καὶ λαμεβάνουσιν αὐξάνεται, καὶ χρηστῆς μὲν οὔσης ὑγιεινόν, φαύλης δὲ φαῦλον.
And on this account when they do not receive food this fails, and when they receive it, it increases, and when the food is good, it is healthy, and when bad, bad.
ὅτι μὲν οὖν τὸ αἷμα τροφῆς ἕνεκεν ὑπάρχει τοῖς ἐναίμοις, φανερὸν ἐκ τούτων καὶ τῶν τοιούτων.
That blood, then, exists for the sake of food in blooded animals is manifest from these and such things.
καὶ γὰρ διὰ τοῦτο θιγγανόμενον αἴσθησιν οὐ ποιεῖ, ὥσπερ οὐδʼ ἄλλο τῶν περιττωμάτων οὐδέυ.
For also on this account when touched it produces no sensation, just as none other of the residues does.
§2.3.77 οὐδʼ ἡ τροφὴ καθάπερ σάρξ· αὕτη γὰρ θιγγανομένη ποιεῖ αἴσθησιν.
7 Nor is the food like flesh; for this when touched produces sensation.
οὐ γὰρ συνεχές ἐστι τὸ αἷμα ταύτῃ οὐδὲ συμπεφυκὸς, ἀλλʼ οἷον ἐν ἀγγείῳ τυγχάνει κείμενον ἔν τε τῇ καρδία καὶ ταῖς φλεψίν.
For blood is not continuous with flesh nor grown together with it, but happens to lie as if in a vessel in the heart and in the blood vessels.
ὃν δὲ τρόπον λαμβάνει ἐξ αὐτοῦ τὰ μόρια τὴν αὔξησιν, ἔτι δὲ περὶ τροφῆς ὅλως, ἐν τοῖς περὶ γενέσεως καὶ ἐν ἑτέροις οἰκειότερόν ἐστι διελθεῖν.
But in what manner the parts receive growth from it, and further concerning food in general, it is more appropriate to discuss in the books on generation and in others.
νῦν δʼ ἐπὶ τοσοῦτον εἰρήσθω (τοσοῦτον γὰρ χρήσιμον), ὅτι τὸ αἷμα τροφῆς ἕνεκα καὶ τροφῆς τῶν μορίων ἐστίν.
But for now let so much be said (for so much is useful), that blood is for the sake of food and food for the parts.

Notes

  1. 4ὥσπερ δὲ καὶ τὸ στόμα... ἕως εἰς τὴν κοιλίαν — In the comparative clause introduced by ὥσπερ, two subjects, τὸ στόμα and τὸ συνεχὲς αὐτῷ μόριον ὃ καλοῦσιν οἰσοφάγον, are coordinated by καὶ... καί. The latter is modified by the parenthetical relative clause ὅσα τῶν ζῴων... (limiting it to animals that possess this part) and the prepositional phrase ἕως εἰς τὴν κοιλίαν indicating the extent up to the stomach. This whole structure corresponds to the main clause starting with οὕτω... δεῖ.
  2. ¦25¦ἐξ ἧς, ὥσπερ ἐκεῖνα ταῖς ῥίζαις, ταῦτα δεῖ τινὶ τὴν τροφὴν λαμβάνειν — The relative pronoun ἧς in ἐξ ἧς agrees in gender and number with the feminine noun γῆ (earth) which metaphorically restates τὸ τῆς κοιλίας κύτος (the cavity of the stomach). In this comparison, while ἐκεῖνα (plants) receive food by their roots (ταῖς ῥίζαις), ταῦτα (animals) must receive it by some means (τινί, i.e., blood vessels), forming an impersonal construction with δεῖ + accusative and infinitive (ταῦτα... λαμβάνειν).
  3. ¦p.30¦παρὰ δὲ ταύτης ἕτερον ἀναγκαῖον λαμβάνειν, ὅπερ συμβέβηκεν — The adjective ἀναγκαῖον governs the infinitive λαμβάνειν in an impersonal construction, with ἕτερον (another thing, i.e., the blood vessels) serving as its logical subject. The relative pronoun ὅπερ refers back to this entire action, functioning as an appositive clause adding the fact that "which indeed has happened."
  4. ¦35¦μὴ λαμβάνουσί τε τροφὴν ὑπολείπει τοῦτο καὶ λαμβάνουσιν αὐξάνεται — Both μὴ λαμβάνουσι and λαμβάνουσι are present participles in the dative plural referring to the animals, agreeing with an implied τοῖς ζῴοις or serving as datives of reference/interest ("for those not receiving... and for those receiving..."). The pronoun τοῦτο refers to blood, which acts as the subject of ὑπολείπει and αὐξάνεται.

Cite this passage

Aristotle, Parts of Animals §2.3.4-2.3.7. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg030.humanitext-grc1:2.3.4-2.3.7

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.