Humanitext Reader

Dionysius of Halicarnassus · Roman Antiquities §8.71.1-8.71.6

Opposition of Verginius and the Tribunes to Cassius

Passage 649 of 962 · Greek

Summary

Cassius' proposal for land distribution met with fierce opposition from the senate, his co-consul Virginius, and the tribunes of the plebs, who joined the patrician cause for various motives. The people wavered constantly, agreeing with the tribunes due to fears of getting smaller shares, but still being swayed by Cassius' effective demagoguery.

§8.71.1εὐθὺς μὲν οὖν ἔτι λέγοντος αὐτοῦ θόρυβος ἦν πολύς, ἀχθομένων ἁπάντων καὶ οὐχ ὑπομενόντων τὸν λόγον.
Immediately, therefore, while he was still speaking, there was a great tumult, as everyone was vexed and would not tolerate his speech.
ἐπειδὴ δʼ ἐπαύσατο ὅ τε συνύπατος αὐτοῦ Οὐεργίνιος πολλὴν ἐποιήσατο κατηγορίαν ὡς στάσιν εἰσάγοντος, καὶ τῶν ἄλλων βουλευτῶν οἱ πρεσβύτατοί τε καὶ τιμιώτατοι, μάλιστα δʼ Ἄππιος Κλαύδιος· καὶ μέχρι πολλῆς ὥρας ἠγριωμένοι τε καὶ τὰ αἴσχιστα κατʼ ἀλλήλων ὀνείδη λέγοντες οὗτοι διετέλεσαν.
When he had finished, his colleague-consul Virginius made a severe accusation against him as introducing sedition, as did the eldest and most respected of the other senators, especially Appius Claudius; and until a late hour, they continued in a state of fury, uttering the most shameful reproaches against one another.
§8.71.2ταῖς δὲ κατόπιν ἡμέραις ὁ μὲν Κάσσιος ἐκκλησίας συνεχεῖς ποιούμενος ἐξεδημαγώγει τὸ πλῆθος, καὶ τοὺς ὑπὲρ τῆς κληρουχίας λόγους εἰσέφερε, καὶ πολὺς ἦν ἐν ταῖς κατηγορίαις τῶν ἀντιπραττόντων.
In the following days, Cassius, by holding continuous assemblies, courted the favor of the multitude, introduced arguments in favor of the land-distribution, and was very active in his accusations against his opponents.
ὁ δʼ Οὐεργίνιος τὴν βουλὴν ὁσημέραι συνάγων μετὰ κοινῆς γνώμης τῶν πατρικίων ἀντιπαρεσκευάζετο φυλακάς τε καὶ κωλύσεις νομίμους.
Virginius, on his part, assembling the senate daily, was preparing, with the common consent of the patricians, defences and legal obstructions against him.
§8.71.3καὶ ἦν στῖφος ἑκατέρῳ τῶν παρακολουθούντων τε καὶ φυλακὴν τῷ σώματι παρεχόντων πολύ· τὸ μὲν ἄπορον καὶ ῥυπαρὸν καὶ πάντα τολμᾶν πρόχειρον ὑπὸ τῷ Κασσίῳ τεταγμένον, τὸ δʼ εὐγενέστατόν τε καὶ καθαρώτατον ὑπὸ τῷ Οὐεργινίῳ.
And there was a large crowd attending each of them and providing protection for their persons; the needy, the squalid, and those ready to dare anything were arranged under Cassius, while the most noble and pure were under Virginius.
§8.71.4τέως μὲν οὖν τὸ χεῖρον ἐν ταῖς ἐκκλησίαις ἐπεκράτει μακρῷ θατέρου προὔχον, ἔπειτα ἰσόρροπον ἐγένετο προσνειμάντων ἑαυτοὺς τῶν δημάρχων τῇ κρείττονι μοίρᾳ·
For a time, indeed, the worse side prevailed in the assemblies, being far superior to the other, but afterwards the balance became equal when the tribunes of the plebs joined themselves to the better party.
τάχα μὲν καὶ διὰ τὸ μὴ δοκεῖν ἄμεινον εἶναι τῇ πόλει δεκασμοῖς τʼ ἀργυρίου καὶ διανομαῖς τῶν δημοσίων διαφθειρόμενον τὸ πλῆθος ἀργὸν καὶ πονηρὸν εἶναι, τάχα δὲ καὶ διὰ τὸν φθόνον, ὅτι τῆς φιλανθρωπίας ταύτης οὐκ αὐτοὶ ἦρξαν οἱ τοῦ δήμου προεστηκότες, ἀλλʼ ἕτερος· οὐθὲν δὲ κωλύει καὶ διὰ τοῦτο τὸ δέος, ὃ πρὸς τὴν αὔξησιν τοῦ ἀνδρὸς ἐλάμβανον μείζονα γενομένην ἢ τῇ πόλει συνέφερεν.
This was perhaps because they did not think it was better for the city that the multitude, corrupted by bribes of money and distributions of public property, should be idle and wicked, and perhaps also through envy, because not they themselves, the leaders of the people, but another had initiated this benevolence; and nothing prevents it from being also because of the fear which they conceived at the growth of the man's power, which was becoming greater than was advantageous to the city.
§8.71.5ἀντέλεγον οὖν ἤδη κατὰ κράτος ἐν ταῖς ἐκκλησίαις οὗτοι πρὸς τοὺς εἰσφερομένους ὑπὸ τοῦ Κασσίου νόμους διδάσκοντες τὸν δῆμον, ὡς οὐκ εἴη δίκαιον, ἃ διὰ πολλῶν ἐκτήσατο πολέμων, ταῦτα μὴ Ῥωμαίους νείμασθαι μόνους, ἀλλὰ καὶ Λατίνους αὐτοῖς ἰσομοιρεῖν τοὺς μὴ παραγενομένους τοῖς πολέμοις, καὶ τοὺς νεωστὶ προσελθόντας πρὸς τὴν φιλίαν Ἕρνικας, οἷς ἀγαπητὸν ἦν πολέμῳ προσαχθεῖσι τὸ μὴ τὴν ἑαυτῶν ἀφαιρεθῆναι χώραν.
These, therefore, now opposed with all their might in the assemblies the laws introduced by Cassius, teaching the people that it was not just that what they had acquired through many wars should not be distributed to Romans alone, but that the Latins, who had not been present in the wars, and the Hernicians, who had recently entered into friendship—and who, having been subdued in war, ought to have been content not to be deprived of their own land—should share equally with them.
§8.71.6ὁ δὲ δῆμος ἀκούων τοτὲ μὲν τοῖς τῶν δημάρχων προσετίθετο λόγοις ἐνθυμούμενος, ὅτι μικρόν τι καὶ οὐκ ἄξιον ἔσται λόγου τὸ ἐκ τῆς δημοσίας γῆς ἐσόμενον ἑκάστῳ λάχος, εἰ μεθʼ Ἑρνίκων τε καὶ Λατίνων αὐτὴν νεμήσονται, τοτὲ δʼ ὑπὸ τοῦ Κασσίου μετεπείθετο δημαγωγοῦντος, ὡς προδιδόντων αὐτοὺς τοῖς πατρικίοις τῶν δημάρχων καὶ πρόφασιν ποιουμένων τῆς κωλύσεως εὐπρεπῆ τὴν Ἑρνίκων τε καὶ Λατίνων ἰσομοιρίαν, ἣν αὐτὸς ἔφη νόμῳ περιλαβεῖν ἰσχύος τῶν πενήτων ἕνεκα καὶ εἴ τις ἀφαιρεῖσθαί ποτε αὐτοὺς ἀξιώσαι τὰ δοθέντα κωλῦσαι, κρεῖττον ἡγούμενος εἶναι καὶ ἀσφαλέστερον τοῖς πολλοῖς μικρὰ λαβοῦσιν ὁμοίως ἔχειν ἢ πολλὰ ἐλπίσασιν ἁπάντων ἀποτυχεῖν.
And the people, hearing this, at one time agreed with the arguments of the tribunes, reflecting that each one's share of the public land would be small and of no account if they should divide it with the Hernicians and the Latins; but at another time they were persuaded back by Cassius, who was playing the demagogue, on the ground that the tribunes were betraying them to the patricians and making the equal distribution with the Hernicians and the Latins a plausible pretext for their obstruction—a distribution which he himself said he had included in the law for the sake of the strength of the poor, and to prevent anyone from ever thinking fit to deprive them of what had been given, deeming it better and safer for the multitude to have a little and keep it in common than, by hoping for much, to fail of everything.

Notes

  1. ¦1679¦ὡς στάσιν εἰσάγοντος — The conjunction ὡς is used with the genitive absolute (the semantic subject of εἰσάγοντος, Cassius, being omitted) to express the subjective reason or allegation made by the subject of the main clause (Virginius).
  2. §8.71.2πολὺς ἦν — The adjective πολύς is used predicatively with a prepositional phrase (ἐν ταῖς κατηγορίαις) in an idiomatic expression meaning "to be very active in" or "to spend much effort in doing something".
  3. §8.71.4οὐθὲν δὲ κωλύει καὶ διὰ τοῦτο — An impersonal construction with the verb κωλύει ("prevents"), literally meaning "and nothing prevents [us from thinking that it was] also due to this". It functions to introduce an additional highly plausible reason.
  4. ¦1682¦ὡς προδιδόντων ... τῶν δημάρχων — The conjunction ὡς with the genitive absolute (noun τῶν δημάρχων and present participle προδιδόντων) expresses the subjective allegation or pretext put forward by Cassius to persuade the people.

Cite this passage

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities §8.71.1-8.71.6. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0081.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:8.71.1-8.71.6

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.