Humanitext Reader

Dionysius of Halicarnassus · Roman Antiquities §3.2.1-3.2.4

Cluilius' Provocation and Schemes for War with Rome

Passage 169 of 962 · Greek

Summary

The Alban leader Cluilius, driven by envy of Rome, schemes to instigate a war by encouraging the poorest Albans to plunder Roman territory; after a Roman counterattack, he accuses them of aggression and prompts the Alban assembly to prepare for war.

§3.2.1πολεμικαὶ δὲ πράξεις πολλαὶ μὲν καὶ ἄλλαι μνημονεύονται, 〈μέγισται δὲ〉 περὶ ὧν ἔρχομαι λέξων τὴν ἀρχὴν ποιησάμενος ἀπὸ τοῦ πρὸς Ἀλβανοὺς πολέμου.
While many other warlike deeds are recorded, <the greatest are> those which I am about to relate, making my beginning with the war against the Albans.
αἴτιος δὲ τοῦ διαστῆναι τὰς πόλεις καὶ λῦσαι τὸ συγγενὲς ἀνὴρ Ἀλβανὸς ἐγένετο Κλοίλιος ὄνομα τῆς μεγίστης ἀρχῆς ἀξιωθείς, ὃς ἀχθόμενος ἐπὶ τοῖς Ῥωμαίων ἀγαθοῖς καὶ κατέχειν τὸν φθόνον οὐ δυνάμενος φύσει τε αὐθάδης καὶ ὑπομαργότερος ὢν ἐκ- §3.2.2πολεμῶσαι τὰς πόλεις ἔγνω πρὸς ἀλλήλας.
The cause of the separation of the cities and of the dissolution of their kinship was an Alban man, Cluilius by name, who had been deemed worthy of the highest office; who, being vexed at the prosperity of the Romans and unable to restrain his envy, and being by nature stubborn and somewhat crazed, resolved to set the cities at war with each other.
οὐχ ὁρῶν δὲ ὅπως ἂν πείσειε τοὺς Ἀλβανοὺς στρατὸν αὑτῷ κατὰ Ῥωμαίων ἄγειν ἐπιτρέψαι μήτε δικαίας ἔχοντι προφάσεις μήτε ἀναγκαίας, μηχανᾶται δή τι τοιόνδε· τοῖς ἀπορωτάτοις Ἀλβανῶν καὶ θρασυτάτοις ἐφῆκε λῃστεύειν τοὺς Ῥωμαίων ἀγροὺς ἄδειαν ὑπισχνούμενος καὶ παρεσκεύασε πολλοὺς ἀκίνδυνα κέρδη διώκοντας, ὧν οὐδὲ κωλυόμενοι ὑπὸ τοῦ δέους ἀποστήσεσθαι ἔμελλον, ἐμπλῆσαι πολέμου λῃστρικοῦ τὴν ὅμορον.
But, not seeing how he might persuade the Albans to permit him to lead an army against the Romans, since he had neither just nor necessary pretexts, he devised some such scheme as this: he permitted the poorest and most daring of the Albans to plunder the Roman fields, promising them impunity, and caused many, pursuing risk-free gains, who were not likely to desist even if deterred by fear, to fill the neighboring country with predatory warfare.
§3.2.3τοῦτο δʼ ἔπραττε κατὰ λογισμὸν οὐκ ἀπεικότα, ὡς τὸ ἔργον ἐμαρτύρησε.
And he did this based on a calculation that was not unreasonable, as the event testified.
Ῥωμαίους μὲν γὰρ οὐκ ἀνέξεσθαι τὰς ἁρπαγὰς ὑπελάμβανεν, ἀλλʼ ἐπὶ τὰ ὅπλα χωρήσειν, αὑτῷ δʼ ἐξουσίαν ἔσεσθαι κατηγορεῖν αὐτῶν πρὸς τὸν δῆμον ὡς ἀρχόντων πολέμου, Ἀλβανῶν δὲ τοὺς πλείστους φθονοῦντας τοῖς ἀποίκοις τῆς εὐτυχίας δέξεσθαι τὰς διαβολὰς ἀσμένους καὶ τὸν κατʼ §3.2.4αὐτῶν πόλεμον ἐξοίσειν, ὅπερ καὶ συνέβη.
For he assumed that the Romans would not tolerate the robberies but would resort to arms, and that he himself would have an opportunity to accuse them before the people of being the initiators of the war, and that most of the Albans, envying the colonists their good fortune, would welcome the slanders and wage war against them, which indeed happened.
ἀγόντων γὰρ καὶ φερόντων ἀλλήλους τῶν κακουργοτάτων ἐξ ἑκατέρας πόλεως καὶ στρατιᾶς ποτε Ῥωμαϊκῆς ἐμβαλούσης εἰς τὴν Ἀλβανῶν, ὑφʼ ἧς πολλοὶ τῶν λῃστῶν οἱ μὲν ἀνῃρέθησαν, οἱ δὲ συνελήφθησαν, συγκαλέσας τὸ πλῆθος εἰς ἐκκλησίαν ὁ Κλοίλιος, ἐν ᾗ πολλὴν ἐποιήσατο τῶν Ῥωμαίων κατηγορίαν, τραυματίας τε συχνοὺς ἐπιδεικνύμενος καὶ τοὺς προσήκοντας τοῖς ἡρπασμένοις ἢ τεθνηκόσι παράγων καὶ πλείω τῶν γεγονότων ἐπικαταψευδόμενος, πρεσβείαν πέμπειν πρῶτον ἐψηφίσατο δίκας αἰτήσουσαν τῶν γεγονότων· ἐὰν δὲ ἀγνωμονῶσι Ῥωμαῖοι τότε τὸν πόλεμον ἐπʼ αὐτοὺς ἐκφέρειν.
For, while the most villainous men from each city were plundering one another, and a Roman army at one time invaded the territory of the Albans, by which many of the plunderers were either killed or captured, Cluilius, having called the multitude to an assembly, in which he made a vehement accusation against the Romans, showing many wounded men, bringing forward the relatives of those plundered or slain, and falsely adding many details beyond what had happened, voted first to send an embassy to demand satisfaction for what had occurred, and if the Romans should be unreasonable, then to wage war against them.

Notes

  1. 3.2.1ἔρχομαι λέξων — The verb ἔρχομαι combined with the future participle (λέξων) expresses an immediate intention or an action about to begin, similar to the English 'be going to'.
  2. 3.2.1περὶ ὧν — The relative pronoun ὧν exhibits the phenomenon of 'attraction of the relative,' where it is assimilated from the accusative (περὶ ἅ) to the genitive case of its omitted antecedent.
  3. 3.2.2ὧν — The antecedent of the relative pronoun ὧν is πολλούς (many). This genitive functions as a 'genitive of separation' required by the subsequent infinitive ἀποστήσεσθαι (to desist).
  4. 3.2.4ἀγόντων γὰρ καὶ φερόντων ἀλλήλους τῶν κακουργοτάτων — A genitive absolute construction employing the idiomatic phrase ἀγόντων καὶ φερόντων (to plunder). It is placed in parallel with the subsequent genitive absolute clause (στρατιᾶς ... ἐμβαλούσης) to set the background before the main verb (ἐψηφίσατο).

Cite this passage

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities §3.2.1-3.2.4. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0081.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:3.2.1-3.2.4

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.