§2.40.1ἔπειτα πάλιν ὁ μὲν Πείσων φησὶ τῶν Σαβίνων τὸν χρυσὸν ἑτοίμων ὄντων διδόναι τῇ κόρῃ τὸν περὶ τοῖς ἀριστεροῖς βραχίοσι τὴν Τάρπειαν οὐ τὸν κόσμον ἀλλὰ τοὺς θυρεοὺς παρʼ αὐτῶν αἰτεῖν.
Then again, Piso says that when the Sabines were ready to give the gold on their left arms to the maiden, Tarpeia demanded from them not their ornaments but their shields.
Τατίῳ δὲ θυμόν τε εἰσελθεῖν ἐπὶ τῇ ἐξαπάτῃ καὶ λογισμὸν τοῦ μὴ παραβῆναι τὰς ὁμολογίας.
And Tatius was seized with anger at this trickery, but at the same time with the consideration of not violating the agreement.
δόξαι δʼ οὖν αὐτῷ δοῦναι μὲν τὰ ὅπλα, ὥσπερ ἡ παῖς ἠξίωσε, ποιῆσαι δʼ ὅπως αὐτοῖς μηδὲν λαβοῦσα χρήσεται, καὶ αὐτίκα διατεινάμενον ὡς μάλιστα ἰσχύος εἶχε ῥῖψαι τὸν θυρεὸν κατὰ τῆς κόρης καὶ τοῖς ἄλλοις παρακελεύσασθαι ταὐτὸ ποιεῖν.
He resolved, therefore, to give her the weapons as the girl had demanded, but to make sure that she should have no use of them after receiving them; and immediately, stretching back with all the strength he had, he hurled his shield at the maiden and urged the others to do the same.
οὕτω δὴ βαλλομένην πάντοθεν τὴν Τάρπειαν ὑπὸ πλήθους τε καὶ ἰσχύος τῶν πληγῶν πεσεῖν καὶ περισωρευθεῖσαν ὑπὸ τῶν θυρεῶν ἀποθανεῖν.
Thus Tarpeia, pelted from all sides, fell under the number and force of the blows and died, overwhelmed by the shields.
§2.40.2οἱ δὲ περὶ τὸν Φάβιον ἐπὶ τοῖς Σαβίνοις ποιοῦσι τὴν τῶν ὁμολογιῶν ἀπάτην· δέον γὰρ αὐτοὺς τὸν χρυσόν, ὥσπερ ἡ Τάρπεια ἠξίου, κατὰ τὰς ὁμολογίας ἀποδιδόναι, χαλεπαίνοντας ἐπὶ τῷ μεγέθει τοῦ μισθοῦ τὰ σκεπαστήρια κατʼ αὐτῆς βαλεῖν, ὡς ταῦτα ὅτε ὤμνυσαν αὐτῇ δώσειν ὑπεσχημένους.
But Fabius and his followers attribute the deception regarding the agreement to the Sabines; for whereas they ought to have paid the gold according to the agreement, as Tarpeia demanded, they, being vexed at the magnitude of the reward, hurled their defensive weapons at her, claiming that they had promised to give her these when they swore to her.
ἔοικε δὲ τὰ μετὰ ταῦτα γενόμενα τὴν Πείσωνος ἀληθεστέραν ποιεῖν.
However, the events that followed seem to make the account of Piso more credible.
§2.40.3τάφου τε γὰρ ἔνθα ἔπεσεν ἠξίωται τὸν ἱερώτατον τῆς πόλεως κατέχουσα λόφον, καὶ χοὰς αὐτῇ Ῥωμαῖοι καθʼ ἕκαστον ἐνιαυτὸν ἐπιτελοῦσι, ʽλέγω δὲ ἃ Πείσων γράφεἰ ὧν οὐδενὸς εἰκὸς αὐτήν, εἰ προδιδοῦσα τὴν πατρίδα τοῖς πολεμίοις ἀπέθανεν, οὔτε παρὰ τῶν προδοθέντων οὔτε παρὰ τῶν ἀποκτεινάντων τυχεῖν, ἀλλὰ καὶ εἴ τι λείψανον αὐτῆς ἦν τοῦ σώματος ἀνασκαφὲν ἔξω ῥιφῆναι σὺν χρόνῳ φόβου τε καὶ ἀποτροπῆς ἕνεκα τῶν μελλόντων τὰ ὅμοια δρᾶν.
For she has been honored with a tomb where she fell, occupying the most sacred hill of the city, and the Romans perform libations to her every year (I am stating what Piso writes); of none of these things is it likely she would have obtained, if she had died betraying her country to the enemy, either from those she betrayed or from those who killed her. On the contrary, if any relic of her body remained, it would have been dug up and cast out in course of time, for the sake of inspiring fear and aversion in those who might attempt to do the like.
ἀλλʼ ὑπὲρ μὲν τούτων κρινέτω τις ὡς βούλεται.
But concerning these matters, let each judge as he pleases.