Demosthenes · On the Treaty with Alexander §24-30
Criticism of Macedonian Partisans and Proposal of War
Summary
The speaker criticizes the absurdity of Macedonian sympathizers in Athens who overlook Macedonia's treaty violations, such as the intrusion into Piraeus, while demanding that only Athens adhere to the agreements. He argues that as long as Athens maintains its naval supremacy, it is capable of self-defense, and proposes declaring war against the treaty-breakers.
§24καὶ ἅμα μικρὰ μὲν τὰ ὑμέτερα ποιοῦσι, τὰ δὲ τῶν ἐχθρῶν ἰσχυρά, ἅμα δὲ λανθάνουσιν ἑαυτοὺς ἀνυπόστατον τὴν πόλιν ὁμολογοῦντες εἶναι, διακελευόμενοι τὸ δίκαιον οὐ δικαίως διαφυλάττειν, ὡς τῷ συμφέροντί γε προελομένην χρῆσθαι κρατεῖν ἂν τῶν πολεμίων ῥᾳδίως δυνηθεῖσαν.
And at the same time they make your affairs small, and those of the enemies strong, while at the same time they are unconsciously admitting that our city is irresistible, by urging us to observe justice in an unjust way, on the ground that, if she chose to act for her own interest, she would easily be able to overcome her enemies.
§25εἰκότως δʼ αὐτὸ πεπόνθασιν· ἕως γὰρ ἂν ἐξῇ τῶν κατὰ θάλατταν καὶ μόνοις ἀναμφισβητήτως εἶναι κυρίοις, τοῖς γε κατὰ γῆν πρὸς τῇ ὑπαρχούσῃ δυνάμει ἔστι προβολὰς ἑτέρας ἰσχυροτέρας εὑρέσθαι, ἄλλως τε καὶ πεπαυμένων ὑπὸ τῆς τύχης τῶν δορυφορουμένων ὑπὸ τῶν τυραννικῶν στρατοπέδων, καὶ τῶν μὲν ἐφθαρμένων, τῶν δὲ ἐξεληλεγμένων οὐδενὸς ἀξίων ὄντων.
And they have naturally suffered this; for as long as it is permitted for us to be undisputed masters of the sea, even alone, it is possible to find other, stronger defenses against land forces, in addition to our existing power, especially since those who are guarded by tyrannical armies have been brought to an end by fortune, some having been destroyed, while others have been proven to be worth nothing.
§26τὸ μὲν οὖν περὶ τὰ πλοῖα πρὸς τοῖς ἄλλοις τοῖς προειρημένοις ὁ Μακεδὼν τηλικοῦτον παρέβη· τὸ δὲ ὑβριστικώτατον καὶ ὑπεροπτικώτατον τῶν Μακεδόνων τὸ πρώην γεγενημένον ἐστί, τὸ τολμῆσαι εἰσπλεῦσαι εἰς τὸν Πειραιᾶ παρὰ τὰς κοινὰς ἡμῖν πρὸς αὐτοὺς ὁμολογίας.
So, in addition to the other things mentioned before, the Macedonian has committed so great a violation regarding the ships; but the most insolent and arrogant act of the Macedonians is what happened recently, namely, their daring to sail into the Piraeus contrary to our common agreements with them.
καὶ τοῦτʼ, ὦ ἄνδρες Ἀθηναῖοι, οὐχ ὅτι μία τριήρης ἦν, μικρὸν ὑποληπτέον, ἀλλʼ ὅτι ἀπόπειρα ἐγένετο, εἰ περιοψόμεθα, ἵνα μετὰ πλειόνων αὐτοῖς ἐγγένηται τοῦτο πράττειν, καὶ ὅτι οὐκ ἐφρόντισαν τῶν κοινῶν δογμάτων, καθάπερ οὐδὲ τῶν προειρημένων.
And this, O men of Athens, must not be considered a small matter because it was only one trireme, but because it was an attempt to see if we would overlook it, so that it might be permitted for them to do this with more ships later, and because they cared nothing for the common decrees, just as they cared nothing for the things mentioned before.
§27ἐπεὶ ὅτι γε τοῦτο παράδυσις ἦν κατὰ μικρὸν καὶ ἐθισμὸς τοῦ ἀνέχεσθαι ἡμᾶς τοὺς τοιούτους εἴσπλους, κἀκεῖθεν δῆλον· τῷ γὰρ τὸν τότε ἐπὶ τῆς νεὼς εἰσπλεύσαντα, ὃν ἔδει εὐθὺς μετὰ τῆς τριήρους ὑφʼ ὑμῶν ἀπολωλέναι, αἰτεῖσθαι ναυπηγήσασθαι μικρὰ πλοῖα ἐν τοῖς ἡμετέροις λιμέσι πῶς οὐ καταφανὲς ὅτι ἀντὶ τοῦ εἰσπλεῖν τὸ εὐθὺς ἔνδον εἶναι ἐμηχανῶντο;
Indeed, that this was a gradual infiltration and an attempt to accustom us to tolerate such intrusions is clear also from this fact: for, from the fact that the man who sailed in command of the ship at that time—who, along with his trireme, ought to have been destroyed immediately by you—requested permission to build small vessels in our harbors, how is it not manifest that, instead of merely sailing in, they were scheming to be already inside from the start?
καὶ εἰ λεπτὰ πλοῖα ὑπομενοῦμεν, ὀλίγον ὕστερον καὶ τριήρεις· καὶ εἰ τὸ πρῶτον ὀλίγας, μικρῷ ὕστερον πολλάς.
And if we tolerate small vessels, shortly after we will tolerate triremes too; and if at first a few, a little later many.
§28οὐ γὰρ δὴ ἔστι γʼ εἰπεῖν ὡς Ἀθήνησι μὲν ἀφθόνων ὄντων τῶν ναυπηγησίμων ξύλων, τῶν μόγις καὶ πόρρωθεν εἰσκομιζομένων, ἐν δὲ τῇ Μακεδονίᾳ ἐπιλελοιπότων, τῇ καὶ τοῖς ἄλλοις τοῖς βουλομένοις εὐτελέστατα καθισταμένῃ, ἀλλʼ ᾤονθʼ ἅμα τε ναυπηγήσεσθαι ἐνταῦθα καὶ πληρώσεσθαι ἐν τῷ λιμένι, ἐν ταῖς κοιναῖς ὁμολογίαις διειρημένον μηδὲν τοιοῦτον εἰσδέχεσθαι, καὶ τοῦτʼ ἐξέσεσθαι ἐπὶ πλέον ἀεὶ ποιεῖν.
For indeed it is not possible to say that, while shipbuilding timber is abundant in Athens—where it is imported with difficulty and from afar—it has run short in Macedonia, which supplies it most cheaply to anyone else who wishes, but they thought they would at once build ships here and man them in our harbor, although it is expressly forbidden in the common agreements to receive any such thing, and that they would be permitted to do this more and more.
§29οὕτω πανταχόθεν καταπεφρονηκότως ἐκεῖνοι τῇ πόλει χρῶνται διὰ τοὺς ἐντεῦθεν διδασκάλους τοὺς ὑπαγορεύοντας αὐτοῖς ἃ δεῖ ποιεῖν· οὕτω δὲ κατεγνώκασι μετὰ τούτων ἀδιήγητόν τινα τῆς πόλεως ἔκλυσιν καὶ μαλακίαν, καὶ οὔτε πρόνοιαν περὶ τῶν μελλόντων εἶναι, οὔτε λογισμὸν οὐδένα παραγίγνεσθαι τίνα τρόπον χρῆται ὁ τύραννος ταῖς κοιναῖς ὁμολογίαις.
In this way, they treat our city with utter contempt from every side, because of their teachers here who dictate to them what they must do; and together with these men, they have condemned the city for an unspeakable slackness and weakness, and they believe that there is neither foresight regarding the future, nor any reflection occurring as to how the tyrant uses the common agreements.
§30/div>αἷς ἐγὼ διακελεύομαι, ὦ ἄνδρες Ἀθηναῖοι, πείθεσθαι, καθάπερ ἐδίδαξα, καὶ διαβεβαιωσαίμην ἄν, ὡς τοῦθʼ ἡλικίας ἔχων, ἅμα καὶ τῷ δικαίῳ ἡμᾶς ἀνεγκλήτως καὶ τοῖς καιροῖς ἀσφαλέστατα χρήσεσθαι τοῖς ἐπὶ τὸ συμφέρον κατεπείγουσιν.
/div>These are the agreements which I urge you, O men of Athens, to obey, just as I have shown, and I would assert, being of this age, that we will at the same time employ justice without blame and use the opportunities most safely which press us toward our advantage.
καὶ γὰρ ἔτι προσγέγραπται ἐν ταῖς συνθήκαις,
ἐὰν βουλώμεθα τῆς κοινῆς εἰρήνης μετέχειν
· τὸ δʼ
ἐὰν βουλώμεθα
ἐστὶν ἅμα καὶ τοὐναντίον, εἰ ἄρα ποτὲ δεῖ παύσασθαι αἰσχρῶς ἑτέροις ἀκολουθοῦντας, ἢ μηδʼ ἀναμνησθῆναι μηδεμιᾶς φιλοτιμίας τῶν ἐξ ἀρχαιοτάτου καὶ πλείστων καὶ μάλιστα πάντων ἀνθρώπων ἡμῖν ὑπαρχουσῶν.
For indeed it is further written in the treaties, "if we wish to share in the common peace"; but this "if we wish" implies at the same time also the opposite, if indeed we must ever cease shamefully following others, or else not even remember any of the sources of honor which have belonged to us from the most ancient times, being the most numerous and greatest of all mankind.
ἐὰν οὖν κελεύητʼ, ὦ ἄνδρες Ἀθηναῖοι, γράψω, καθάπερ αἱ συνθῆκαι κελεύουσι, πολεμεῖν τοῖς παραβεβηκόσιν.
If, therefore, you command, O men of Athens, I will propose a decree, just as the treaties command, to make war against those who have violated them.
Notes
- §24λανθάνουσιν ἑαυτοὺς ἀνυπόστατον τὴν πόλιν ὁμολογοῦντες εἶναι — The construction of the verb λανθάνω with the reflexive pronoun ἑαυτούς and the participle ὁμολογοῦντες. It literally means 'they escape their own notice admitting,' which is translated as 'they admit without realizing it.'
- §24ὡς τῷ συμφέροντί γε προελομένην χρῆσθαι κρατεῖν ἂν τῶν πολεμίων ῥᾳδίως δυνηθεῖσαν — The conjunction ὡς with the participles προελομένην and δυνηθεῖσαν (agreeing with τὴν πόλιν in the previous clause) expresses a subjective reason or allegation. The particle ἄν with the participle δυνηθεῖσαν represents a potential optative in a hypothetical statement, with the conditional participle προελομένην acting as the protasis ('if she should choose... she would be able to...').
- §27τῷ γὰρ τὸν τότε ἐπὶ τῆς νεὼς εἰσπλεύσαντα... αἰτεῖσθαι... πῶς οὐ καταφανές — The dative article τῷ introducing an infinitive clause (τὸν ... εἰσπλεύσαντα ... αἰτεῖσθαι) functions as an articular infinitive expressing cause or instrument ('for by the fact that the one who sailed... requested...'). The structure is complex due to the relative clause ὃν ἔδει... inserted between the subject accusative τὸν ... εἰσπλεύσαντα and its infinitive αἰτεῖσθαι, but the entire phrase τῷ ... αἰτεῖσθαι forms the causal foundation of the main question.
- §30αἷς ἐγὼ διακελεύομαι — The relative pronoun αἷς at the beginning of the sentence (dative plural feminine) refers back to ταῖς κοιναῖς ὁμολογίαις in the preceding sentence, functioning as a connective relative ('And these agreements I urge you...').
Cite this passage
Demosthenes, On the Treaty with Alexander §24-30. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg017.humanitext-grc2:24-30
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.