§5.1τὸ δὲ πάντων μέγιστον, ὡς ἐγὼ νομίζω, τῶν εἰρημένων ἐκεῖνό ἐστιν, ὅτι Λύσανδρος μὲν κατώρθου πάντα τῶν οἴκοι συναγωνιζομένων, Σύλλας δὲ φυγὰς ὢν καὶ κατεστασιασμένος ὑπὸ τῶν ἐχθρῶν, καθʼ ὃν χρόνον ἠλαύνετο μὲν αὐτοῦ γυνή, κατεσκάπτετο δὲ οἰκία, φίλοι δὲ ἀπέθνησκον, αὐτὸς ἐν Βοιωτίᾳ ταῖς ἀναριθμήτοις μυριάσι παρατασσόμενος καὶ κινδυνεύων ὑπὲρ τῆς πατρίδος, §5.2ἵστη τρόπαιον, καὶ Μιθριδάτῃ συμμαχίαν διδόντι καὶ δύναμιν ἐπὶ τοὺς ἐχθροὺς οὐδὲν οὐδαμῆ μαλακὸν ἐνέδωκεν οὐδὲ φιλάνθρωπον, ἀλλʼ οὐδὲ προσεῖπεν οὐδὲ τὴν δεξιὰν ἐνέβαλε πρότερον ἢ πυθέσθαι παρόντος ὅτι καὶ τὴν Ἀσίαν ἀφίησι καὶ τὰς ναῦς παραδίδωσι καὶ τοῖς βασιλεῦσιν ἐξίσταται καὶ Βιθυνίας καὶ Καππαδοκίας.
But the greatest of all the things mentioned, as I think, is this: that while Lysander succeeded in all things with those at home cooperating with him, Sulla, being an exile and driven out by factional strife by his enemies, at the very time when his wife was being banished, his house demolished, and his friends put to death, himself in Boeotia drawing up against countless myriads and risking danger for his country, set up a trophy, and when Mithridates offered him an alliance and a force against his enemies, he yielded nothing at all of softness or friendliness, but would not even address him or give him his right hand until he had learned from him in person that he would both relinquish Asia, hand over his ships, and withdraw from Bithynia and Cappadocia in favor of their kings.
§5.3ὧν οὐδὲν ὅλως δοκεῖ Σύλλας κάλλιον ἔργον οὐδὲ ἀπὸ μείζονος εἰργάσθαι φρονήματος, ὅτι τὸ κοινὸν τοῦ οἰκείου πρόσθεν θέμενος, καὶ καθάπερ οἱ γενναῖοι κύνες οὐκ ἀνεὶς τὸ δῆγμα καὶ τὴν λαβὴν πρότερον ἢ τὸν ἀνταγωνιστὴν ἀπειπεῖν, τότε πρὸς τὴν τῶν ἰδίων ἄμυναν ὥρμησεν.
Of these deeds, Sulla seems to have performed none more beautiful, nor from a greater high-mindedness, than that, having placed the public interest before his private concerns, and like noble hounds not releasing his bite and grip until the antagonist has given up, only then did he set out to the defense of his own affairs.
§5.4ἐπὶ πᾶσι δὲ καὶ τὸ περὶ τὰς Ἀθήνας ἔχει τινὰ ῥοπὴν εἰς ἤθους σύγκρισιν εἴγε Σύλλας μὲν ὑπὲρ τῆς Μιθριδάτου δυνάμεως καὶ ἡγεμονίας πολεμήσασαν αὐτῷ τὴν πόλιν ἑλὼν ἐλευθέραν ἀφῆκε καὶ αὐτόνομον, Λύσανδρος δὲ τοσαύτης ἡγεμονίας καὶ ἀρχῆς ἐκπεσοῦσαν οὐκ ᾤκτειρεν, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὴν δημοκρατίαν ἀφελόμενος ὠμοτάτους αὐτῇ καὶ παρανόμους ἀπέδειξε τοὺς τυράννους.
And in addition to all this, the affair concerning Athens also has some weight in the comparison of their characters; inasmuch as Sulla, having captured the city which had warred against him on behalf of Mithridates' power and sovereignty, left it free and independent, whereas Lysander showed no pity for it when it had fallen from so great a hegemony and empire, but even took away its democracy and appointed over it the most cruel and lawless tyrants.
§5.5ὥρα δὴ σκοπεῖν, μὴ οὐ πολὺ τἀληθοῦς διαμαρτάνωμεν ἀποφαινόμενοι πλέονα μὲν κατωρθωκέναι Σύλλαν, ἐλάττονα δὲ ἐξημαρτηκέναι Λύσανδρον, καὶ τῷ μὲν ἐγκρατείας καὶ σωφροσύνης, τῷ δὲ στρατηγίας καὶ ἀνδρείας ἀποδιδόντες τὸ πρωτεῖον.
It is high time indeed to consider whether we are not missing the truth by a wide margin if we declare that Sulla achieved greater successes, but Lysander committed fewer errors, and if we award to the one the first place in self-control and moderation, but to the other in generalship and courage.