Humanitext Reader

Plutarch · Comparison of Lysander and Sulla §4.1-4.5

Comparison of Military Deeds and Caliber of Enemies

Passage 4 of 5 · Greek

Summary

The author compares the military achievements of Sulla and Lysander, arguing that Sulla was far superior in the manner of his death and the high caliber of the enemies he faced.

§4.1πολέμων δὲ ἀγῶσι καὶ στρατηγικαῖς πράξεσι καὶ πλήθει τροπαίων καὶ μεγέθει κινδύνων ἀσύγκριτος ὁ Σύλλας.
In the conflicts of war, military achievements, the number of trophies, and the magnitude of dangers, Sulla is beyond comparison.
ὁ μέντοι γε δύο νίκας ἐξηνέγκατο ναυμαχίαις δυσί· προσθήσω δὲ αὐτῷ τὴν Ἀθηνῶν πολιορκίαν, ἔργῳ μὲν οὐ μεγάλην, τῇ δὲ δόξῃ λαμπροτάτην γενομένην.
The other, however, carried off two victories in two naval battles; and I will add to his credit the siege of Athens, which, though not a great work in reality, became most illustrious in reputation.
§4.2τὰ δʼ ἐν Βοιωτίᾳ καὶ Ἁλιάρτῳ δυστυχίᾳ μὲν ἴσως ἐπράχθη τινί, κακοβουλίᾳ δὲ προσέοικεν οὐκ ἀναμείναντος ὅσον οὔπω παροῦσαν ἐκ Πλαταιῶν τὴν μεγάλην τοῦ βασιλέως δύναμιν, ἀλλὰ θυμῷ καὶ φιλοτιμίᾳ παρὰ καιρὸν ὠσαμένου πρὸς τὸ τεῖχος, ὥστε τοὺς τυχόντας ἀνθρώπους ἐκπηδήσαντας ἐν οὐδενὶ λόγῳ καταβαλεῖν αὐτόν, οὐ γὰρ ὡς Κλεόμβροτος ἐν Λεύκτροις ἀντερείδων ἐπικειμένοις τοῖς πολεμίοις, οὐδὲ ὡς Κῦρος οὐδὲ ὡς Ἐπαμεινώνδας κατέχων ἐγκεκλικότας καὶ τὸ νίκημα βεβαιούμενος πληγῇ καιρίᾳ περιέπεσεν·
But the events in Boeotia and Haliartus were performed perhaps with a certain misfortune, yet they resemble imprudence, since he did not wait for the great force of the king which was all but present from Plataea, but out of anger and ambition rushed inopportunely against the wall, so that ordinary men, leaping out, struck him down as of no account.
§4.3ἀλλʼ οὗτοι μὲν βασιλέων καὶ στρατηγῶν θάνατον ἀπέθνησκον, Λύσανδρος δὲ πελταστοῦ καὶ προδρόμου δίκην ἀκλεῶς παραναλώσας ἑαυτόν, ἐμαρτύρησε τοῖς παλαιοῖς Σπαρτιάταις ὅτι καλῶς ἐφυλάττοντο τὰς τειχομαχίας, ἐν αἷς οὐχ ὑπʼ ἀνδρὸς μόνον τοῦ τυχόντος, ἀλλὰ καὶ ὑπὸ παιδὸς καὶ γυναικὸς ἀποθανεῖν ἂν συντύχοι πληγέντα τὸν κράτιστον, ὥσπερ τὸν Ἀχιλλέα φασὶν ὑπὸ τοῦ Πάριδος ἐν ταῖς πύλαις ἀναιρεθῆναι.
For he did not fall like Cleombrotus at Leuctra, resisting the enemies who pressed upon him, nor like Cyrus, nor like Epaminondas, who, holding back the retreating foes and securing his victory, met with a timely blow; but while these men died the death of kings and generals, Lysander, having ingloriously thrown away his life like a targeteer or a forerunner, bore witness for the ancient Spartans that they did well to avoid assaults on walls, in which not only an ordinary man, but even a child or a woman might happen to strike and kill the bravest man, just as they say Achilles was slain by Paris at the gates.
§4.4Σύλλας μὲν οὖν ὅσας ἐκ παρατάξεως ἐνίκησε νίκας καὶ κατέβαλε μυριάδας πολεμίων οὐδὲ ἀριθμῆσαι ῥᾴδιόν ἐστιν αὐτὴν δὲ τὴν Ῥώμην δὶς εἷλε, καὶ τὸν Πειραιᾶ τῶν Ἀθηνῶν οὐ λιμῷ καθάπερ Λύσανδρος, ἀλλὰ πολλοῖς ἀγῶσι καὶ μεγάλοις, ἐκβαλὼν Ἀρχέλαον ἐκ τῆς γῆς ἐπὶ τὴν θάλατταν, κατέσχεν.
Now Sulla, how many victories he won in pitched battles and how many tens of thousands of enemies he overthrew, it is not even easy to count; and he took Rome itself twice, and he captured the Peiraeus of Athens, not by famine like Lysander, but through many great conflicts, driving Archelaus out of the land to the sea.
ἔστι δὲ μέγα καὶ τὸ τῶν ἀντιστρατήγων, τρυφὴν γὰρ οἶμαι καὶ παιδιὰν πρὸς Ἀντίοχον διαναυμαχεῖν τὸν Ἀλκιβιάδου κυβερνήτην, καὶ Φιλοκλέα τὸν Ἀθηναίων ἐξαπατᾶν δημαγωγόν, "ἄδοξον, ἄκραν γλῶσσαν ἠκονημένον" οὓς οὐκ ἂν ἱπποκόμῳ Μιθριδάτης οὐδὲ ῥαβδούχῳ Μάριος ἠξίωσε παραβαλεῖν τῶν ἑαυτοῦ.
Great also was the caliber of his opponents; for I think it was sport and play to fight a naval battle against Antiochus, the pilot of Alcibiades, and to deceive Philocles, the popular leader of the Athenians, "inglorious, having his sharp tongue whetted," whom Mithridates would not have deigned to compare with his groom, nor Marius with his lictor.
§4.5τῶν δὲ πρὸς Σύλλαν ἀνταραμένων δυναστῶν, ὑπάτων, στρατηγῶν, δημαγωγῶν, ἵνα τοὺς ἄλλους ἐάσω, τίς ἦν Ῥωμαίων Μαρίου φοβερώτερος ἢ Μιθριδάτου βασιλέων δυνατώτερος ἢ Λαμπωνίου καὶ Τελεσίνου τῶν Ἰταλικῶν μαχιμώτερος;
But of the potentates, consuls, generals, and popular leaders who rose up against Sulla, to pass over the rest, who among the Romans was more formidable than Marius, or who among the kings was more powerful than Mithridates, or who among the Italians was more warlike than Lamponius and Telesinus?
ὧν ἐκεῖνος τὸν μὲν ἐξέβαλε, τὸν δὲ ὑπέταξε, τοὺς δὲ ἀπέκτεινε.
Of these, the former he banished, the second he subdued, and the others he slew.

Notes

  1. §4.2οὐκ ἀναμείναντος ... ὠσαμένου — Although the logical subject is Lysander, it is expressed in the genitive absolute construction because it does not agree with the grammatical subject of the main clause (τὰ δʼ ἐν Βοιωτίᾳ... ἐπράχθη).
  2. §4.4ἔστι δὲ μέγα καὶ τὸ τῶν ἀντιστρατήγων — Here `τὸ τῶν ἀντιστρατήγων` is a neuter noun phrase meaning "the matter (or quality) of the opposing generals", and the subsequent `γάρ` clause provides the concrete grounds for its greatness, contrastive to the insignificant opponents Lysander faced.
  3. §4.4οὓς οὐκ ἂν ... ἠξίωσε — The combination of the particle `ἄν` with the aorist indicative (`ἠξίωσε`) expresses a past counterfactual statement or past potentiality ("would not have deigned"). The relative pronoun `οὓς` refers back to Antiochus and Philocles.

Cite this passage

Plutarch, Comparison of Lysander and Sulla §4.1-4.5. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg034.humanitext-grc2:4.1-4.5

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.