§2.1ὅτι τοίνυν ἁπλοῦς τις ὁ Μάρκιος ὑπείληπται τῷ τρόπῳ γεγονέναι καὶ αὐθέκαστος, ὁ δὲ Ἀλκιβιάδης πανοῦργος ἐν τῇ πολιτείᾳ καὶ ἀναλήθης, οὐκ ἄδηλόν ἐστι.
Now, that Marcius is held to have been simple and straightforward in his character, whereas Alcibiades was unscrupulous in his public life and untruthful, is not unclear.
μάλιστα δὲ κατηγοροῦσιν αὐτοῦ κακοήθειαν καὶ ἀπάτην, ᾗ τοὺς Λακεδαιμονίων πρέσβεις παρακρουσάμενος, ὡς Θουκυδίδης ἱστόρηκε, τὴν εἰρήνην ἔλυσεν.
And they especially accuse him of malice and deceit, by which, having deceived the Lacedaemonian ambassadors, as Thucydides has recorded, he dissolved the peace.
§2.2ἀλλʼ αὕτη μὲν ἡ πολιτείᾳ, καίπερ εἰς πόλεμον αὖθις ἐμβαλοῦσα τὴν πόλιν, ἰσχυρὰν ἐποίησε καὶ φοβερὰν, τῆς Μαντινέων καὶ Ἀργείων συμμαχίας διʼ Ἀλκιβιάδου προσγενομένης· Μάρκιος δʼ ὅτι μὲν ἀπάτῃ καὶ αὐτὸς ἐξεπολέμωσε Ῥωμαίους καὶ Οὐολούσκους διαβαλὼν ψευδῶς τοὺς ἥκοντας ἐπὶ τὴν θέαν, Διονύσιος ἱστόρηκεν ἡ δʼ αἰτία φαυλότερον ποιεῖ τὸ ἔργον.
But this policy, although it threw the city into war again, made it strong and formidable, since the alliance of the Mantineans and Argives was added to it through Alcibiades; on the other hand, that Marcius himself also, by deceit, stirred up war between the Romans and Volscians, falsely slandering those who had come for the spectacle, Dionysius has recorded, but his motive makes the deed baser.
§2.3οὐ γὰρ ἐκ φιλονεικίας οὐδὲ πολιτικῆς μάχης ἢ ἁμίλλης, ὡς ἐκεῖνος, ἀλλʼ ὀργῇ χαριζόμενος, παρʼ ἧς οὐδένα φησὶν ὁ Δίων ἀπολαβεῖν χάριν, πολλὰ τῆς Ἰταλίας μέρη συνετάραξε καὶ πολλὰς πόλεις οὐδὲν ἀδικούσας τῷ πρὸς τὴν πατρίδα θυμῷ παρανάλωσε.
For he did not do it out of rivalry, nor out of political strife or competition like the former, but by indulging his anger—from which Dion says no one receives any gratitude—he threw many parts of Italy into confusion, and, in his wrath against his country, utterly destroyed many cities that had done no wrong.
καίτοι καὶ Ἀλκιβιάδης διʼ ὀργὴν μεγάλων αἴτιος συμφορῶν κατέστη τοῖς πολίταις.
And yet, Alcibiades also, because of anger, became the cause of great disasters to his fellow citizens.
§2.4ἀλλʼ ὅτε πρῶτον ἔγνω μεταμελομένους, εὐγνωμόνησε, καὶ πάλιν ἀπορριφείς οὐκ ἐφήσθη τοῖς στρατηγοῖς ἁμαρτάνουσιν οὐδὲ παρεῖδε κακῶς βουλευομένους καὶ κινδυνεύοντας, ἀλλʼ, ὅπερ Ἀριστείδης ἐπαινεῖται μάλιστα πράξας πρὸς Θεμιστοκλέα, τοῦτʼ ἐποίησε, πρὸς τοὺς τότʼ ἄρχοντας οὐ φίλους ὄντας ἐλθὼν καὶ φράσας τὸ δέον καὶ διδάξας.
But as soon as he first perceived that they were repenting, he showed a generous spirit; and when he was rejected again, he did not exult over the generals who were making mistakes, nor did he overlook them when they were planning badly and running into danger, but he did precisely what Aristides is most praised for having done toward Themistocles: he went to the commanders of that time, who were not his friends, and told them what was necessary and instructed them.
§2.5Μάρκιος δὲ πρῶτον μὲν ὅλην κακῶς ἐποίει τὴν πόλιν οὐχ ὑφ̓ὅλης παθών, ἀλλὰ τοῦ βελτίστου καὶ κρατίστου μέρους συναδικηθέντος αὐτῷ καὶ συναλγήσαντος· ἔπειτα πολλαῖς πρεσβείαις καὶ δεήσεσι μίαν ἰωμένων ὀργὴν καὶ ἄγνοιαν οὐ τεγχθεὶς οὐδʼ εἴξας ἐδήλωσεν ἐπὶ τῷ διαφθεῖραι τὴν πατρίδα καὶ καταβαλεῖν, οὐχ ὅπως ἀπολάβῃ καὶ κατέλθῃ, βαρὺν πόλεμον καὶ ἄσπονδον ἐπανῃρημένος.
On the other hand, Marcius, in the first place, did harm to the whole city, although he had not suffered at the hands of the whole city, but while the best and most powerful part of it had been wronged along with him and shared his pain; in the second place, by not being softened or yielding to many embassies and supplications of those who tried to heal his single anger and ignorance, he made it clear that he had undertaken a grievous and implacable war, not in order to recover and return to his country, but in order to destroy and overthrow it.
§2.6τούτῳ δὲ φήσει τις διαφέρειν Ἀλκιβιάδην μὲν γὰρ ἐπιβουλευόμενον ὑπὸ Σπαρτιατῶν διὰ δέος ἅμα καὶ μῖσος αὐτῶν μεταστῆναι πρὸς Ἀθηναίους, Μαρκίῳ δὲ πάντα δίκαια ποιοῦντας Οὐολούσκους οὐ καλῶς εἶχεν ἐγκαταλιπεῖν.
But someone will say that they differ in this: that Alcibiades, being plotted against by the Spartans, went over to the Athenians out of both fear and hatred of them, whereas for Marcius, it was not honorable to abandon the Volscians, who were doing everything that was just toward him.
καὶ γὰρ ἡγεμὼν ἀποδέδεικτο καὶ μεγίστην πίστιν εἶχε μετὰ δυνάμεως, §2.7οὐχ ὡς ἐκεῖνος, ἀποχρωμένων μᾶλλον ἢ χρωμένων αὐτῷ Λακεδαιμονίων, ἐν τῇ πόλει περιιών καὶ κυλινδούμενος αὖθις ἐν τῷ στρατοπέδῳ τέλος εἰς τὰς Τισαφέρνου χεῖρας ἀφῆκεν αὑτόν· εἰ μὴ νὴ Δία μὴ φθαρῆναι τὰς Ἀθήνας παντάπασι ποθῶν κατελθεῖν ἐθεράπευε.
For he had been appointed commander and held the greatest trust along with power, unlike the former, who, since the Lacedaemonians abused rather than used him, went about in the city and was tossed about again in the camp, and finally threw himself into the hands of Tissaphernes; unless, by Zeus, he was courting him because he desired to return, wishing that Athens should not be utterly destroyed.