Humanitext Reader

Thucydides · History of the Peloponnesian War §3.82.1-3.82.8

Analysis of the Pathology of Civil Strife

Passage 331 of 917 · Greek

Summary

Using the civil war in Corcyra as a starting point, Thucydides analyzes the devastating effects of civil strife (stasis) across Greece, demonstrating how the pressures of war corrupted human nature, inverted moral values, and collapsed social trust.

§3.82.1οὕτως ὠμὴ 〈ἡ〉 στάσις προυχώρησε, καὶ ἔδοξε μᾶλλον, διότι ἐν τοῖς πρώτη ἐγένετο, ἐπεὶ ὕστερόν γε καὶ πᾶν ὡς εἰπεῖν τὸ Ἑλληνικὸν ἐκινήθη, διαφορῶν οὐσῶν ἑκασταχοῦ τοῖς τε τῶν δήμων προστάταις τοὺς Ἀθηναίους ἐπάγεσθαι καὶ τοῖς ὀλίγοις τοὺς Λακεδαιμονίους.
So the civil strife went on to such a pitch of cruelty, and it seemed all the more cruel because it was the first to occur among them; for later, one might say, the whole Hellenic world was shaken, since there were differences everywhere, the leaders of the democratic parties trying to bring in the Athenians, and the oligarchs the Lacedaemonians.
καὶ ἐν μὲν εἰρήνῃ οὐκ ἂν ἐχόντων πρόφασιν οὐδ’ ἑτοίμων παρακαλεῖν αὐτούς, πολεμουμένων δὲ καὶ ξυμμαχίας ἅμα ἑκατέροις τῇ τῶν ἐναντίων κακώσει καὶ σφίσιν αὐτοῖς ἐκ τοῦ αὐτοῦ προσποιήσει ῥᾳδίως αἱ ἐπαγωγαὶ τοῖς νεωτερίζειν τι βουλομένοις ἐπορίζοντο.
In time of peace, indeed, they would have had no pretext for calling them in, nor would they have been ready to do so; but in war, when alliances were at hand for both sides, with a view to the injury of their opponents and their own acquisition of strength from the same source, opportunities for calling in foreign aid were easily provided for those who wished to make any revolutionary change.
§3.82.2καὶ ἐπέπεσε πολλὰ καὶ χαλεπὰ κατὰ στάσιν ταῖς πόλεσι, γιγνόμενα μὲν καὶ αἰεὶ ἐσόμενα, ἕως ἂν ἡ αὐτὴ φύσις ἀνθρώπων ᾖ, μᾶλλον δὲ καὶ ἡσυχαίτερα καὶ τοῖς εἴδεσι διηλλαγμένα, ὡς ἂν ἕκασται αἱ μεταβολαὶ τῶν ξυντυχιῶν ἐφιστῶνται.
And many terrible calamities befell the cities through civil strife, things which happen and always will happen as long as the nature of mankind remains the same, though they may be more violent or milder and vary in their phenomena, according as the individual changes of circumstances occur.
ἐν μὲν γὰρ εἰρήνῃ καὶ ἀγαθοῖς πράγμασιν αἵ τε πόλεις καὶ οἱ ἰδιῶται ἀμείνους τὰς γνώμας ἔχουσι διὰ τὸ μὴ ἐς ἀκουσίους ἀνάγκας πίπτειν· ὁ δὲ πόλεμος ὑφελὼν τὴν εὐπορίαν τοῦ καθ’ ἡμέραν βίαιος διδάσκαλος καὶ πρὸς τὰ παρόντα τὰς ὀργὰς τῶν πολλῶν ὁμοιοῖ.
For in peace and prosperous times both states and individuals have better sentiments, because they do not fall into involuntary necessities; but war, taking away the easy supply of daily wants, is a violent teacher and assimilates the tempers of the multitude to their present conditions.
§3.82.3ἐστασίαζέ τε οὖν τὰ τῶν πόλεων, καὶ τὰ ἐφυστερίζοντά που πύστει τῶν προγενομένων πολὺ ἐπέφερε τὴν ὑπερβολὴν τοῦ καινοῦσθαι τὰς διανοίας τῶν τ’ ἐπιχειρήσεων περιτεχνήσει καὶ τῶν τιμωριῶν ἀτοπίᾳ.
So the cities were torn by civil strife, and those which were later in the movement, having heard of what had been done before, went to far greater extremes in the novelty of their designs, both in the ingenuity of their enterprises and the monstrosity of their revenges.
§3.82.4καὶ τὴν εἰωθυῖαν ἀξίωσιν τῶν ὀνομάτων ἐς τὰ ἔργα ἀντήλλαξαν τῇ δικαιώσει.
And they changed the customary value of words in relation to deeds to suit their own justification.
τόλμα μὲν γὰρ ἀλόγιστος ἀνδρεία φιλέταιρος ἐνομίσθη, μέλλησις δὲ προμηθὴς δειλία εὐπρεπής, τὸ δὲ σῶφρον τοῦ ἀνάνδρου πρόσχημα, καὶ τὸ πρὸς ἅπαν ξυνετὸν ἐπὶ πᾶν ἀργόν·
For reckless audacity was considered loyal courage; prudent hesitation, specious cowardice; moderation, a cloak for unmanliness; and to be wise in everything, to be lazy in everything.
τὸ δ’ ἐμπλήκτως ὀξὺ ἀνδρὸς μοίρᾳ προσετέθη, ἀσφαλείᾳ δὲ τὸ ἐπιβουλεύσασθαι ἀποτροπῆς πρόφασις εὔλογος.
A frantic impulsiveness was attributed to the part of a man; while to plot from a position of safety was a plausible pretext for backing out.
§3.82.5καὶ ὁ μὲν χαλεπαίνων πιστὸς αἰεί, ὁ δ’ ἀντιλέγων αὐτῷ ὕποπτος.
The man of violent temper was always trusted, and he who opposed him was suspected.
ἐπιβουλεύσας δέ τις τυχὼν ξυνετὸς καὶ ὑπονοήσας ἔτι δεινότερος· προβουλεύσας δὲ ὅπως μηδὲν αὐτῶν δεήσει, τῆς τε ἑταιρίας διαλυτὴς καὶ τοὺς ἐναντίους ἐκπεπληγμένος.
He who plotted successfully was deemed clever, and he who detected a plot beforehand was still more formidable; but he who took precautions so that none of these things should be necessary was a dissolver of his party and terrified by his opponents.
ἁπλῶς δὲ ὁ φθάσας τὸν μέλλοντα κακόν τι δρᾶν ἐπῃνεῖτο, καὶ ὁ ἐπικελεύσας τὸν μὴ διανοούμενον.
In short, praise was given to him who anticipated another in about to commit an evil deed, and to him who encouraged one who had no such intention.
§3.82.6καὶ μὴν καὶ τὸ ξυγγενὲς τοῦ ἑταιρικοῦ ἀλλοτριώτερον ἐγένετο διὰ τὸ ἑτοιμότερον εἶναι ἀπροφασίστως τολμᾶν·
Indeed, even the bond of kinship became more foreign than that of faction, because the latter was readier to dare without asking for pretexts.
οὐ γὰρ μετὰ τῶν κειμένων νόμων ὠφελίας αἱ τοιαῦται ξύνοδοι, ἀλλὰ παρὰ τοὺς καθεστῶτας πλεονεξίᾳ.
For such associations were not formed for mutual benefit in accordance with the established laws, but for selfish greed in violation of them.
καὶ τὰς ἐς σφᾶς αὐτοὺς πίστεις οὐ τῷ θείῳ νόμῳ μᾶλλον ἐκρατύνοντο ἢ τῷ κοινῇ τι παρανομῆσαι.
And they confirmed their pledges to one another not so much by divine law as by a common violation of the law.
§3.82.7τά τε ἀπὸ τῶν ἐναντίων καλῶς λεγόμενα ἐνεδέχοντο ἔργων φυλακῇ, εἰ προύχοιεν, καὶ οὐ γενναιότητι.
As for fair proposals from their adversaries, they received them with a watchful eye on their actions, if they had the upper hand, and not with high-mindedness.
ἀντιτιμωρήσασθαί τέ τινα περὶ πλείονος ἦν ἢ αὐτὸν μὴ προπαθεῖν.
To take revenge on someone was held of more account than not to suffer injury oneself.
καὶ ὅρκοι εἴ που ἄρα γένοιντο ξυναλλαγῆς, ἐν τῷ αὐτίκα πρὸς τὸ ἄπορον ἑκατέρῳ διδόμενοι ἴσχυον οὐκ ἐχόντων ἄλλοθεν δύναμιν· ἐν δὲ τῷ παρατυχόντι ὁ φθάσας θαρσῆσαι, εἰ ἴδοι ἄφαρκτον, ἥδιον διὰ τὴν πίστιν ἐτιμωρεῖτο ἢ ἀπὸ τοῦ προφανοῦς, καὶ τό τε ἀσφαλὲς ἐλογίζετο καὶ ὅτι ἀπάτῃ περιγενόμενος ξυνέσεως ἀγώνισμα προσελάμβανεν.
Oaths of reconciliation, if any were ever made, being offered by either side only in immediate difficulty because they had no power from elsewhere, remained in force; but on any opportunity, he who first took courage, if he saw his enemy off his guard, took a sweeter revenge because of the trust than he would have done openly, reckoning both the safety of it and that by prevailing through deceit he gained a prize for cleverness.
ῥᾷον δ’ οἱ πολλοὶ κακοῦργοι ὄντες δεξιοὶ κέκληνται ἢ ἀμαθεῖς ἀγαθοί, καὶ τῷ μὲν αἰσχύνονται, ἐπὶ δὲ τῷ ἀγάλλονται.
The majority of men find it easier to be called clever rogues than simple good men; and they are ashamed of the latter, but pride themselves on the former.
§3.82.8πάντων δ’ αὐτῶν αἴτιον ἀρχὴ ἡ διὰ πλεονεξίαν καὶ φιλοτιμίαν· ἐκ δ’ αὐτῶν καὶ ἐς τὸ φιλονικεῖν καθισταμένων τὸ πρόθυμον.
The cause of all these evils was the desire for rule motivated by greed and ambition, and from these arose the eagerness of those who once entered into rivalry.
οἱ γὰρ ἐν ταῖς πόλεσι προστάντες μετὰ ὀνόματος ἑκάτεροι εὐπρεποῦς, πλήθους τε ἰσονομίας πολιτικῆς καὶ ἀριστοκρατίας σώφρονος προτιμήσει, τὰ μὲν κοινὰ λόγῳ θεραπεύοντες ἆθλα ἐποιοῦντο, παντὶ δὲ τρόπῳ ἀγωνιζόμενοι ἀλλήλων περιγίγνεσθαι ἐτόλμησάν τε τὰ δεινότατα ἐπεξῇσάν τε τὰς τιμωρίας ἔτι μείζους, οὐ μέχρι τοῦ δικαίου καὶ τῇ πόλει ξυμφόρου προτιθέντες, ἐς δὲ τὸ ἑκατέροις που αἰεὶ ἡδονὴν ἔχον ὁρίζοντες, καὶ ἢ μετὰ ψήφου ἀδίκου καταγνώσεως ἢ χειρὶ κτώμενοι τὸ κρατεῖν ἑτοῖμοι ἦσαν τὴν αὐτίκα φιλονικίαν ἐκπιμπλάναι.
For the leaders in the cities on either side, using specious names—the one party advocating the political equality of the multitude, the other a moderate aristocracy—while professing in word to serve the public interest, made it the prize of their contest; and competing by every means to get the better of one another, they dared the most terrible deeds and carried their revenges to still greater heights, not limiting them by justice and the interest of the state, but defining them always by what was pleasing to their own faction at the moment, and being ready to satisfy their immediate rivalry either by the condemnation of an unjust verdict or by gaining the upper hand by force of hand.
ὥστε εὐσεβείᾳ μὲν οὐδέτεροι ἐνόμιζον, εὐπρεπείᾳ δὲ λόγου οἷς ξυμβαίη ἐπιφθόνως τι διαπράξασθαι, ἄμεινον ἤκουον.
Thus, neither side valued piety, but those who happened to accomplish some invidious deed by specious language were better spoken of.
τὰ δὲ μέσα τῶν πολιτῶν ὑπ’ ἀμφοτέρων ἢ ὅτι οὐ ξυνηγωνίζοντο ἢ φθόνῳ τοῦ περιεῖναι διεφθείροντο.
And the neutral citizens were destroyed by both factions, either because they would not join them or from envy that they should survive.

Notes

  1. 3.82.1ἐν τοῖς πρώτη — The phrase ἐν τοῖς is an idiomatic construction used to strengthen superlatives or equivalent adjectives (here, πρώτη), meaning 'especially first' or 'among the very first'.
  2. 3.82.1οὐκ ἂν ἐχόντων — The participle ἐχόντων accompanied by ἄν functions as the apodosis of a potential or counterfactual conditional, implying 'if it had been in time of peace, they would not have had any pretext'.
  3. 3.82.2ὡς ἂν ἕκασται αἱ μεταβολαὶ τῶν ξυντυχιῶν ἐφιστῶνται — The conjunction ὡς with ἄν followed by the subjunctive ἐφιστῶνται expresses an indefinite future manner or condition: 'according as the individual changes of circumstances may occur'.
  4. 3.82.4τὴν εἰωθυῖαν ἀξίωσιν τῶν ὀνομάτων ἐς τὰ ἔργα ἀντήλλαξαν τῇ δικαιώσει — A highly abstract expression meaning 'they changed the customary evaluation of words in relation to deeds to suit their own justification'. Here, ἀντήλλαξαν means 'they exchanged (accusative) for (ἐς + accusative)', and τῇ δικαιώσει refers to their self-justifying evaluation of actions.
  5. 3.82.8τὰ δὲ μέσα τῶν πολιτῶν ... διεφθείροντο — The cause of the destruction of neutral citizens is explained through an asymmetrical parallel structure: the clause ἢ ὅτι οὐ ξυνηγωνίζοντο (fact-clause) and the noun phrase ἢ φθόνῳ τοῦ περιεῖναι (dative of cause with a genitive infinitive), denoting 'either because they did not join them, or from envy that they survived'.

Cite this passage

Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War §3.82.1-3.82.8. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:3.82.1-3.82.8

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.