Humanitext Reader

Thucydides · History of the Peloponnesian War §3.42.1-3.42.6

Rejection of Haste and Anger in Defense of Free Speech

Passage 291 of 917 · Greek

Summary

Diodotus argues that haste, anger, and slanderous accusations of bribery undermine good counsel in the assembly, and asserts that a wise city must foster a safe environment for free and rational debate.

§3.42.1‘οὔτε τοὺς προθέντας τὴν διαγνώμην αὖθις περὶ Μυτιληναίων αἰτιῶμαι, οὔτε τοὺς μεμφομένους μὴ πολλάκις περὶ τῶν μεγίστων βουλεύεσθαι ἐπαινῶ, νομίζω δὲ δύο τὰ ἐναντιώτατα εὐβουλίᾳ εἶναι, τάχος τε καὶ ὀργήν, ὧν τὸ μὲν μετὰ ἀνοίας φιλεῖ γίγνεσθαι, τὸ δὲ μετὰ ἀπαιδευσίας καὶ βραχύτητος γνώμης.
'I neither blame those who have put forward the reconsideration concerning the Mytilenaeans, nor do I praise those who object to deliberating many times on the most important matters; but I think that two things are most contrary to good counsel, haste and anger, of which the former is wont to be accompanied by folly, and the latter by lack of education and narrowness of mind.
§3.42.2τούς τε λόγους ὅστις διαμάχεται μὴ διδασκάλους τῶν πραγμάτων γίγνεσθαι, ἢ ἀξύνετός ἐστιν ἢ ἰδίᾳ τι αὐτῷ διαφέρει· ἀξύνετος μέν, εἰ ἄλλῳ τινὶ ἡγεῖται περὶ τοῦ μέλλοντος δυνατὸν εἶναι καὶ μὴ ἐμφανοῦς φράσαι, διαφέρει δ’ αὐτῷ, εἰ βουλόμενός τι αἰσχρὸν πεῖσαι εὖ μὲν εἰπεῖν οὐκ ἂν ἡγεῖται περὶ τοῦ μὴ καλοῦ δύνασθαι, εὖ δὲ διαβαλὼν ἐκπλῆξαι ἂν τούς τε ἀντεροῦντας καὶ τοὺς ἀκουσομένους.
And whoever contends that words do not become teachers of actions is either stupid or has some private interest at stake; stupid, if he thinks it possible to explain the future and the non-manifest by any other means; and he has a private interest, if, wishing to persuade you to something shameful, he thinks he would not be able to speak well about what is not honorable, but by slandering well he might strike terror into both those who would speak against him and those who would listen.
§3.42.3χαλεπώτατοι δὲ καὶ οἱ ἐπὶ χρήμασι προσκατηγοροῦντες ἐπίδειξίν τινα.
But most difficult of all are those who also, for money, accuse someone of making some display.
εἰ μὲν γὰρ ἀμαθίαν κατῃτιῶντο, ὁ μὴ πείσας ἀξυνετώτερος ἂν δόξας εἶναι ἢ ἀδικώτερος ἀπεχώρει· ἀδικίας δ’ ἐπιφερομένης πείσας τε ὕποπτος γίγνεται καὶ μὴ τυχὼν μετὰ ἀξυνεσίας καὶ ἄδικος.
For if they were accusing them of ignorance, the one who failed to persuade would depart appearing to be more stupid than unjust; but when injustice is charged, the one who persuades becomes suspected, and the one who fails is deemed both stupid and unjust.
§3.42.4ἥ τε πόλις οὐκ ὠφελεῖται ἐν τῷ τοιῷδε· φόβῳ γὰρ ἀποστερεῖται τῶν ξυμβούλων.
And the city is not benefited in such a state of affairs; for through fear she is deprived of her counselors.
καὶ πλεῖστ’ ἂν ὀρθοῖτο ἀδυνάτους λέγειν ἔχουσα τοὺς τοιούτους τῶν πολιτῶν· ἐλάχιστα γὰρ ἂν πεισθεῖεν ἁμαρτάνειν.
And she would fare best if she had such citizens incapable of speaking; for they would be least persuaded to make mistakes.
§3.42.5χρὴ δὲ τὸν μὲν ἀγαθὸν πολίτην μὴ ἐκφοβοῦντα τοὺς ἀντεροῦντας, ἀλλ’ ἀπὸ τοῦ ἴσου φαίνεσθαι ἄμεινον λέγοντα, τὴν δὲ σώφρονα πόλιν τῷ τε πλεῖστα εὖ βουλεύοντι μὴ προστιθέναι τιμήν, ἀλλὰ μηδ’ ἐλασσοῦν τῆς ὑπαρχούσης, καὶ τὸν μὴ τυχόντα γνώμης οὐχ ὅπως ζημιοῦν ἀλλὰ μηδ’ ἀτιμάζειν.
But the good citizen ought to show himself to speak better, not by terrifying his opponents, but on equal terms; and the wise city ought not to add honor to the one who counsels best, but not even to diminish what he already has, and the one who fails to win approval for his opinion, far from punishing him, she ought not even to disgrace him.
§3.42.6οὕτω γὰρ ὅ τε κατορθῶν ἥκιστα ἂν ἐπὶ τῷ ἔτι μειζόνων ἀξιοῦσθαι παρὰ γνώμην τι καὶ πρὸς χάριν λέγοι, ὅ τε μὴ ἐπιτυχὼν ὀρέγοιτο τῷ αὐτῷ χαριζόμενός τι καὶ αὐτὸς προσάγεσθαι τὸ πλῆθος.
For thus the one who succeeds would least of all, for the sake of being thought worthy of still greater honors, speak contrary to his judgment and to please, and the one who fails would not strive, by also gratifying the multitude in some way, to win them over to himself.'

Notes

  1. §3.42.1μὴ πολλάκις περὶ τῶν μεγίστων βουλεύεσθαι — The infinitive phrase with μή depends on the participle μεμφομένους. The negation μή modifies βουλεύεσθαι, expressing the content of the complaint: "blaming [them] for not [wanting] to deliberate often."
  2. §3.42.2τούς τε λόγους — Set at the beginning of the sentence as a prolepsis (anticipation) before the relative clause, functioning as the semantic subject of the subsequent infinitive γίγνεσθαι.
  3. §3.42.3ἐπὶ χρήμασι — The preposition ἐπί with the dative case expresses motive or condition ("for money" or "under bribery"), explaining the motivation of προσκατηγοροῦντες.
  4. §3.42.6ἥκιστα ἂν — This negative potential adverbial phrase modifies the first optative verb λέγοι and also extends its negative influence to the subsequent optative ὀρέγοιτο ("would least of all strive...").

Cite this passage

Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War §3.42.1-3.42.6. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0003.tlg001.humanitext-grc2:3.42.1-3.42.6

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.