Humanitext Reader

Hilary of Poitiers · Lessor Fragments §2.1.1-2.1.3

Purification through Temptation and Fleshly Struggle

Passage 1 of 3 · Latin

Summary

The author quotes a homily on the Book of Job to explain how divine mercy turns the devil's temptations and our physical struggles into a means of purification.

§2.1.1In quadam uero homilia de libro sancti lob attende, quid dicat, quemadmodum ipsius diaboli aduersus nos indesinens bellum ex hoc fieri asserat, cum ea mala, quae in nobis sunt, excitat contra nos, quod in nostram fieri utilitatem uult docere, conuertente scilicet diuina misericordia malitiam diaboli ad purgationem nostram: Tanta enim et tam admirabilis, inquit, in nos misericordiae dei bonitas est, ut, per quem in Adae offensa generositatem primae et beatae illius creationis amisimus, pereum rursum inquit amisimus, obtinere mereamur.
But pay attention, in a certain homily on the book of holy Job, to what he says, how he asserts that the ceaseless war of the devil himself against us arises from this, when he excites against us those evils which are in us, which he wishes to teach happens for our benefit, with divine mercy of course turning the malice of the devil into our purification: For so great, he says, and so admirable is the goodness of God's mercy toward us, that, through whom we lost in Adam's transgression the nobility of that first and blessed creation, through him again, he says we lost, we may deserve to obtain.
tunc enim diabolus inuidens nocuit, nunc autem, cum nocere nititur, uincitur.
For then the devil harmed us out of envy, but now, when he strives to harm, he is conquered.
mouet enim per infirmitatem carnis nostrae omnia potestatis suae tela, cum ad lasciuiam accendit, cum ad ebrietatem illicit, cum ad odia stimulat, cum ad auaritiam prouocat, cum ad caedes instruit, cum ad maledicta exacerbat.
For he moves all the weapons of his power through the weakness of our flesh, when he inflames to luxury, when he entices to drunkenness, when he stimulates to hatred, when he provokes to avarice, when he equips for slaughter, when he exasperates to evil words.
§2.1.2sed cum per firmitatem animi horum omnium subrepentia incentiua reprimuntur, emundamur a peccato per huius uictoriae gloriam; dictum enim ita est: aut quomodo se emundabit natus ex muliere? quia non extante hoste non erit bellum, cessante deinde bello uictoria deerit.
But when by the firmness of the mind the creeping incentives of all these things are repressed, we are cleansed from sin through the glory of this victory; for it is said thus: "Or how shall he cleanse himself who is born of a woman?" Because if the enemy is not present, there will be no war, and then, if the war ceases, victory will be lacking.
collidentium autem adutrsus nos uitiorum uictoria non adepta non erit emundatio ulla uitiorum, quia his insidiis corporis nostri pirata uicto conluctantium aduersus nos passionum concertatione purgamur.
And if victory over the vices clashing against us is not obtained, there will not be any purification of vices, because we are purified by the conflict of passions struggling against us, with the pirate of our body conquered in these ambushes.
§2.1.3memores igitur, inquit, et conscii illa ipsa corpora nostra omnium uitiorum esse materiem, per quam polluti et sordidi nihil in nobis mundum, nihil innocens obtinemus, gaudeamus nobis esse hostem, in cuius concertatione quodam concertationis nostrae bello dimicemus.
Therefore, mindful, he says, and conscious that those very bodies of ours are the material of all vices, through which, polluted and filthy, we possess nothing clean, nothing innocent in ourselves, let us rejoice that we have an enemy, in whose conflict we may fight in a certain war of our struggle.

Notes

  1. §2.1.1In quadam uero homilia — The phrase 'de libro sancti Iob' modifies 'homilia'. The imperative 'attende' governs two indirect question clauses: 'quid dicat' and 'quemadmodum... asserat'. 'conuertente... misericordia' is an ablative absolute construction indicating the reason or manner.
  2. §2.1.1per quem ... per eum — The antecedent of the relative pronoun 'quem' is the demonstrative/personal pronoun 'eum' in the ablative case, which follows it (anticipatory relative clause). The words 'inquit amisimus' appear to be a textual corruption or repetition, but the main syntax leads to 'obtinere mereamur' within the consecutive 'ut' clause.
  3. §2.1.2collidentium autem adutrsus nos uitiorum uictoria non adepta — 'adutrsus' is a spelling mistake for the preposition 'aduersus' (against). 'collidentium... uitiorum' is a genitive plural phrase modifying 'uictoria'. 'uictoria non adepta' is an ablative absolute phrase meaning 'if victory is not obtained'.
  4. §2.1.2corporis nostri pirata uicto — 'corporis nostri pirata uicto' is an ablative absolute construction (with 'pirata' as a first-declension masculine noun in the ablative singular) expressing means or cause for the passive verb 'purgamur'. 'his insidiis' is an ablative of place or means modifying 'uicto'.
  5. §2.1.3memores igitur, inquit, et conscii illa ipsa corpora nostra omnium uitiorum esse materiem — The nominative plural adjectives 'memores' and 'conscii' agree with the implied first-person plural subject of the hortatory subjunctive 'gaudeamus'. They govern the accusative and infinitive (AcI) clause 'illa ipsa corpora nostra... esse materiem', functioning as the complement of the adjectives.

Cite this passage

Hilary of Poitiers, Lessor Fragments §2.1.1-2.1.3. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:stoa0149b.stoa003.humanitext-lat1:2.1.1-2.1.3

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.