[ULPIANUS libro septuagensimo nono ad edictum. ] §7.9.7.prSi usus fructus nomine re tradita satisdatum non fuerit, Proculus ait posse heredem rem uindicare, et si obiciatur exceptio de re usus fructus nomine tradita, replicandum erit.
[ULPIANUS in the seventy-ninth book on the Edict.] If, after a thing has been delivered under the name of a usufruct, security has not been given, Proculus says that the heir can claim the thing back; and if the "exception of a thing delivered under the name of a usufruct" is opposed, a replication must be made.
quae sententia habet rationem: sed et ipsa stipulatio condici poterit.
This opinion is reasonable; but the stipulation itself can also be sued for by condictio.
§7.9.7.1Cum usus fructus pecuniae legatus esset, exprimi debent hi duo casus in stipulatione: 'cum morieris aut capite minueris, dari': idcirco hi duo soli casus, quoniam pecuniae usus aliter amitti non potest quam his casibus.
When a usufruct of money has been bequeathed, these two cases must be expressed in the stipulation: 'to be given when you die or suffer loss of status'; therefore, only these two cases, since the use of money cannot be lost otherwise than in these cases.