[IDEM libro secundo responsorum. ] §6.1.65.prEmptor praedium, quod a non domino emit, exceptione doli posita non aliter restituere domino cogetur, quam si pecuniam creditori eius solutam, qui pignori datum praedium habuit, usurarumque medii temporis superfluum reciperauerit, scilicet si minus in fructibus ante litem perceptis fuit: nam eos usuris nouis dumtaxat compensari sumptuum in praedium factorum exemplo aequum est.
[THE SAME in the second book of Responses.] A purchaser who has bought an estate from a non-owner will not otherwise be compelled to restore it to the owner, upon raising the plea of fraud, than if he recovers the money paid to the creditor of the owner who held the estate as a pledge, and the excess of the interest of the intermediate period, that is, of course, if the fruits gathered before the suit were less; for it is equitable, after the model of expenses incurred on the estate, that those fruits should be compensated only against the interest.
§6.1.65.1Ancillam, quae non in dotem data, sed in peculium filiae concessa est, peculio filiae non legato mancipium hereditarium esse conuenit.
It is agreed that a female slave who was not given as a dowry but granted as part of a daughter's peculium is a slave belonging to the inheritance, if the daughter's peculium was not bequeathed to her.
si tamen pater dotis ac peculii contemplatione filiam exheredauit et ea ratione reddita nihil ei testamento reliquit aut eo minus legauit, filiam defensio tuebitur uoluntatis.
If, however, the father disinherited his daughter in consideration of the dowry and peculium, and, this reason being given, left her nothing in his will or bequeathed so much less to her, the defense of the testator's intention will protect the daughter.