[IDEM eodem libro. ] §50.8.12.prImperatores Antoninus et Uerus rescripserunt operum exactionem sine cautione non oportere committi.
[The same, in the same book.] The Emperors Antoninus and Verus replied in a rescript that the enforcement of works ought not to be entrusted without security.
§50.8.12.1Item rescripserunt curatores, si neglegenter in distrahendis bonis se gesserint, in simplum teneri, si per fraudem, in duplum: nec ad heredes eorum poenam descendere.
They also replied that administrators, if they have acted negligently in selling goods, are liable for the simple value, and if through fraud, for double; and that the penalty does not descend to their heirs.
§50.8.12.2Item rescripserunt pecuniam ad annonam destinatam distractis rebus curatorem exigere debere.
They also replied that the administrator ought to exact the money destined for the grain supply, after the property has been sold.
§50.8.12.3Item rescripserunt sitonas indemnes esse oportere, qui non segniter officio suo functi sunt, secundum litteras Hadriani.
They also replied that, according to the letter of Hadrian, the grain buyers who have not performed their duty sluggishly ought to be kept harmless.
§50.8.12.4Item rescripserunt a curatore kalendarii cautionem exigi non debere, cum a praeside ex inquisitione eligatur.
They also replied that security ought not to be exacted from the administrator of the debt ledger, since he is selected by the governor after an inquiry.
§50.8.12.5Item rescripserunt curatorem etiam nomine collegae teneri, si interuenire et prohibere eum potuit.
They also replied that an administrator is liable also in the name of his colleague, if he was able to intervene and prevent him.
§50.8.12.6Item rescripserunt nominum, quae deteriora facta sunt tempore curatoris, periculum ad ipsum pertinere: quia uero antequam curator fieret, idonea non erant, aequum uideri periculum ad eum non pertinere.
They also replied that the risk of the debts which became worse during the term of the administrator pertains to him; but because they were not solvent before he became administrator, it seems equitable that the risk does not pertain to him.