[PAULUS libro sexto ad legem Iuliam et Papiam. ] §50.16.142.prTriplici modo coniunctio intellegitur: aut enim re per se coniunctio contingit, aut re et uerbis, aut uerbis tantum.
[PAULUS, from the sixth book on the Lex Iulia et Papia.] Union is understood in a threefold manner: for either union occurs through the thing itself, or through both the thing and the words, or through the words only.
nec dubium est, quin coniuncti sint, quos et nominum et rei complexus iungit, ueluti 'Titius et Maeuius ex parte dimidia heredes sunto', uel ita 'Titius Maeuiusque heredes sunto', uel 'Titius cum Maeuio ex parte dimidia heredes sunto'.
And there is no doubt that those whom the combination of both names and thing joins together are joined, as for instance: 'Let Titius and Maevius be heirs for a half share', or thus: 'Let Titius and Maevius be heirs', or: 'Let Titius with Maevius be heirs for a half share'.
uideamus autem, ne etiam si hos articulos detrahas 'et' 'que' 'cum', interdum tamen coniunctos accipi oporteat, ueluti 'Lucius Titius, Publius Maeuius ex parte dimidia heredes sunto', uel ita 'Publius Maeuius, Lucius Titius heredes sunto.
But let us see whether, even if you take away these connectives 'et', 'que', 'cum', it might not sometimes still be necessary for them to be accepted as joined, as for instance: 'Let Lucius Titius, Publius Maevius be heirs for a half share', or thus: 'Let Publius Maevius, Lucius Titius be heirs.
Sempronius ex parte dimidia heres esto', ut Titius et Maeuius ueniant in partem dimidiam et re et uerbis coniuncti uideantur.
Let Sempronius be heir for a half share', so that Titius and Maevius come into the half share and appear joined both in thing and in words.
'Lucius Titius ex parte dimidia heres esto.
Also: 'Let Lucius Titius be heir for a half share.
Seius ex parte, qua Lucium Titium heredem institui, heres esto.
Let Seius be heir for that share in which I instituted Lucius Titius as heir.
Sempronius ex parte dimidia heres esto'. Iulianus dubitari posse, tres semisses facti sint an Titius in eundem semissem cum Gaio Seio institutus sit.
Let Sempronius be heir for a half share.' Julian says that it can be doubted whether three half shares have been made, or whether Titius was instituted into the same half share with Gaius Seius.
sed eo, quod Sempronius quoque ex parte dimidia scriptus est, uerisimilius esse in eundem semissem duos coactos et coniunctim heredes scriptos esse.
But from the fact that Sempronius also was written for a half share, it is more probable that the two were compressed into the same half share and written as heirs jointly.