[IDEM libro septimo epistularum. ] §50.16.116.pr'Quisquis mihi alius filii filiusue heres sit': Labeo non uideri filiam contineri, Proculus contra.
[THE SAME, in the seventh book of his Epistles.] 'Whoever else, the son or [daughter] of my son, shall be my heir': Labeo thought that a daughter is not considered to be included, Proculus was of the opposite opinion.
mihi Labeo uidetur uerborum figuram sequi, Proculus mentem testantis.
To me, Labeo seems to follow the literal form of the words, Proculus the intention of the testator.
respondit: non dubito, quin Labeonis sententia uera non sit.
He replied: "I have no doubt that Labeo's opinion is not correct."