[IDEM libro secundo disputationum. ] §5.2.25.prSi non mortis causa fuerit donatum, sed inter uiuos, hac tamen contemplatione, ut in quartam habeatur: potest dici inofficiosi querellam cessare, si quartam in donatione habet aut si minus habeat, quod deest uiri boni arbitratu repleatur: aut certe conferri oportere id quod donatum est.
[BY THE SAME AUTHOR in his Second Book of Disputations.] If a gift was made not mortis causa, but inter vivos, yet with this contemplation, that it should be counted toward the fourth part: it can be said that the complaint of an inofficious testament does not lie, if he has the fourth part in the donation; or if he has less, that what is lacking should be made up by the decision of an honorable man; or at least, that what was donated ought to be brought into collation.
§5.2.25.1Si quis, cum non possit de inofficioso queri, ad querellam admissus pro parte rescindere testamentum temptet et unum sibi heredem eligat, contra quem inofficiosi querellam instituat, dicendum est, quia testamentum pro parte ualet et praecedentes eum personae exclusae sunt, cum effectu eum querellam instituisse.
If anyone who, although he could not complain of an inofficious testament, having been admitted to the complaint, should attempt to rescind the testament in part and choose for himself one heir against whom he may bring the complaint of an inofficious testament, it must be said that, because the testament is valid in part and the persons preceding him are excluded, he has brought the complaint with effect.