[IDEM libro primo disputationum. ] §5.1.64.prNon ab iudice doli aestimatio ex eo quod interest fit, sed ex eo quod in litem iuratur: denique et praedoni depositi et commodati ob eam causam competere actionem non dubitatur.
[THE SAME, in the First Book of Disputations.] The assessment of fraud is not made by the judge on the basis of what is of interest, but on the basis of what is sworn to in the lawsuit; hence, there is no doubt that even a plunderer has a right of action for deposit and loan for use for this reason.
§5.1.64.1Si quis alio iudicio acturus iudicatum solui satis acceperit, deinde in alio iudicio agat, non committetur stipulatio, quia de alia re cautum uidetur.
If anyone, intending to sue in a certain lawsuit, has received security for the payment of the judgment, and then sues in another lawsuit, the stipulation is not forfeited, because security seems to have been given for a different matter.