[ULPIANUS libro quinto opinionum. ] §49.15.21.prSi quis ingenuam ab hostibus redemptam eo animo secum habuerit, ut ex ea susciperet liberos, et postea ex se natum sub titulo naturalis filii cum matre manumiserit: ignorantia mariti eiusdemque patris neque statui eorum, quos manumisisse uisus est, officere debet, et exinde intellegi oportet remissum matri pignoris uinculum, ex quo de ea suscipere liberos optauerat: ideoque eam, quae postliminio reuersa erat libera et ingenua, ingenuum peperisse constat.
[ULPIANUS, Book 5 of Opinions] If anyone has kept with him a freeborn woman redeemed from the enemy with the intention of having children by her, and has afterwards manumitted the child born of himself together with the mother under the title of a natural son: the ignorance of the husband and father ought not to prejudice the status of those whom he is deemed to have manumitted; and from that moment it should be understood that the bond of pledge over the mother was released, from the time when he had desired to have children by her; and therefore it is established that she, who had returned by postliminium free and freeborn, gave birth to a freeborn child.
quod si publice praeda uirtute militum reciperata nulli pretium matris pater numerauerit, protinus postliminio reuersa non cum domino, sed cum marito fuisse declaratur.
But if, the booty having been recovered publicly by the valour of the soldiers, the father paid the price of the mother to no one, she is declared, having immediately returned by postliminium, to have been not with a master, but with a husband.
§49.15.21.1In ciuilibus dissensionibus quamuis saepe per eas res publica laedatur, non tamen in exitium rei publicae contenditur: qui in alterutras partes discedent, uice hostium non sunt eorum, inter quos iura captiuitatium aut postliminiorum fuerint.
In civil dissensions, although the commonwealth is often injured by them, yet the struggle is not for the destruction of the commonwealth; those who separate into either party are not in the position of enemies, between whom the rights of captivity or postliminium would exist.
et ideo captos et uenumdatos posteaque manumissos placuit superuacuo repetere a principe ingenuitatem, quam nulla captiuitate amiserant.
And therefore it was held that those who had been captured and sold, and afterwards manumitted, superfluously petition the emperor for the status of free birth, which they had not lost by any captivity.