[PAPINIANUS libro trigensimo primo quaestionum. ] §49.15.11.prQuod si filius ante moriatur in ciuitate, nihil est quod de secundis tabulis tractari possit, siue quoniam uiuo patre filius familias mori intellegitur, siue quoniam non reuerso eo exinde sui iuris uidetur fuisse, ex quo pater hostium potitus est.
[PAPINIANUS, from the Thirty-First Book of Questions.] But if the son should die beforehand in the state, there is nothing that can be discussed regarding the second tablets, whether because he is understood to have died as a filius familias during the lifetime of his father, or because, since his father did not return, he is deemed to have been sui iuris from the moment when his father was captured by the enemy.
§49.15.11.1Sed si ambo apud hostes et prior pater decedat, sufficiat lex Cornelia substituto non alias, quam si apud hostes patre defuncto postea filius in ciuitate decessisset.
But if both are with the enemy and the father should die first, the Lex Cornelia would be sufficient for the substitute, not otherwise than if, after the father had died with the enemy, the son had afterwards died in the state.