[SCAEUOLA libro quarto regularum. ] §48.5.15.prIs, cuius ope consilio dolo malo factum est, ut uir feminae in adulterio deprehensi pecunia aliaue qua pactione se redimerent, eadem poena damnatur, quae constituta est in eos, qui lenocinii crimine damnantur.
[SCAEUOLA, in the fourth book of Rules.] He by whose aid, counsel, or wilful fraud it was brought about that the husband of the woman, and those caught [together] in adultery, should redeem themselves with money or some other agreement, is condemned to the same penalty that has been established against those who are condemned for the crime of procuring.
§48.5.15.1Si uir infamandae uxoris suae causa adulterum subiecerit, ut ipse deprehenderet, et uir et mulier adulterii crimine tenentur ex senatus consulto de ea re facto.
If a husband, for the sake of defaming his wife, should suborn an adulterer so that he himself might catch them, both the husband and the woman are held liable for the crime of adultery under the senatus consultum passed concerning this matter.
§48.5.15.2Marito primum, uel patri eam filiam quam in potestate habet, intra dies sexaginta diuortii accusare permittitur nec ulli alii intra id tempus agendi potestas datur: ultra eos dies neutrius uoluntas exspectatur.
Within sixty days of the divorce, permission to accuse is granted in the first place to the husband, or to the father in respect of that daughter whom he has under his power, and within that time the power of bringing an action is given to no one else; beyond those days, the will of neither is waited for.
§48.5.15.3Iure mariti qui accusant, calumniae periculum non euitant.
Those who accuse under the right of a husband do not escape the danger of false accusation.